Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/users/joeo10/statuses/113080664381467539">Joe Ortiz (joeo10@mastodon.sdf.org)'s status on Thursday, 05-Sep-2024 03:20:12 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/@joeo10" title="joeo10@mastodon.sdf.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/92668-48-20230128144844.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Joe Ortiz" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Joe Ortiz</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/@joeo10/112718610573576427" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p>This ruling is a HUGE blow to not only the <a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/InternetArchive" rel="tag">#InternetArchive</a> (<a href="https://mastodon.archive.org/@internetarchive">@internetarchive</a>) but <a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/digitalpreservation" rel="tag">#digitalpreservation</a> and <a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/libraries" rel="tag">#libraries</a> as a whole. <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/internet-archive-loses-hachette-books-case-appeal/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.wired.com/story/internet-archive-loses-hachette-books-case-appeal/</a><br><a href="https://archive.ph/9irhZ" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://archive.ph/9irhZ</a></p><p>Official document is here: <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.60988/gov.uscourts.ca2.60988.306.1.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.60988/gov.uscourts.ca2.60988.306.1.pdf</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2274931#notice-7087396">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-09-05T03:20:12+09:00" title="Thursday, 05-Sep-2024 03:20:12 JST">about 5 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/@joeo10/113080664381467539" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.sdf.org via ActivityPub">mastodon.sdf.org</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/@joeo10/113080664381467539">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: media.wired.com</div><h5><a href="https://www.wired.com/story/internet-archive-loses-hachette-books-case-appeal/">The Internet Archive Loses Its Appeal of a Major Copyright Case</a></h5><div> from <span>Kate Knibbs</span></div></header><div>Hachette v. Internet Archive was brought by book publishers objecting to the archive’s digital lending library.</div><footer></footer></article></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3123106">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3123107">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Joe Ortiz (joeo10@mastodon.sdf.org)'s status on Thursday, 05-Sep-2024 03:20:12 JSTJoe Ortiz
in reply to
- internetarchive
This ruling is a HUGE blow to not only the #InternetArchive (@internetarchive) but #digitalpreservation and #libraries as a whole. https://www.wired.com/story/internet-archive-loses-hachette-books-case-appeal/
https://archive.ph/9irhZ
Official document is here: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.60988/gov.uscourts.ca2.60988.306.1.pdf
In conversationabout 5 months ago from mastodon.sdf.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: media.wired.com
  The Internet Archive Loses Its Appeal of a Major Copyright Case
  from Kate Knibbs
  Hachette v. Internet Archive was brought by book publishers objecting to the archive’s digital lending library.
2. Untitled attachment
3. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice