Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://dice.camp/users/thoughtpunks/statuses/113067731796197295">Thought Punks (thoughtpunks@dice.camp)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2024 21:43:27 JST</a><a href="https://dice.camp/@thoughtpunks" title="thoughtpunks@dice.camp"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/157330-48-20230804124605.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Thought Punks" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Thought Punks</a></section><article><p>Well, <a href="https://dice.camp/tags/NaNoWriMo" rel="tag">#NaNoWriMo</a> is ruined now. Because WTF is this nonsense? </p><p>STOP MINIMIZING AND INFANTALIZING THE DISABLED. In case you didn't know it, NaNoWriMo, we kind of hate that. </p><p>Sauce: <a href="https://nanowrimo.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/29933455931412-What-is-NaNoWriMo-s-position-on-Artificial-Intelligence-AI" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://nanowrimo.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/29933455931412-What-is-NaNoWriMo-s-position-on-Artificial-Intelligence-AI</a></p><p>P.S. On the classism, that is unhinged in its detachment. For real, have they never met poor and working class writers and artists? We're MORE likely to work together.</p><p><a href="https://dice.camp/tags/Writing" rel="tag">#Writing</a> <a href="https://dice.camp/tags/Writers" rel="tag">#Writers</a> <a href="https://dice.camp/tags/Disabled" rel="tag">#Disabled</a> <a href="https://dice.camp/tags/Disability" rel="tag">#Disability</a> <a href="https://dice.camp/tags/Prejudice" rel="tag">#Prejudice</a> <a href="https://dice.camp/tags/Ableism" rel="tag">#Ableism</a> <a href="https://dice.camp/tags/AI" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="https://dice.camp/tags/Propaganda" rel="tag">#Propaganda</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3602933#notice-7066404">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-09-02T21:43:27+09:00" title="Monday, 02-Sep-2024 21:43:27 JST">about 11 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://dice.camp/@thoughtpunks/113067731796197295" rel="external" title="Sent from dice.camp via ActivityPub">dice.camp</a></span></span><a href="https://dice.camp/@thoughtpunks/113067731796197295">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3113315">We also want to be clear in our belief that the categorical condemnation of Artificial Intelligence has classist and ableist undertones, and that questions around the use of AI tie to questions around privilege. 
Classism. Not all writers have the financial ability to hire humans to help at certain phases of their writing. For some writers, the decision to use AI is a practical, not an ideological, one. The financial ability to engage a human for feedback and review assumes a level of privilege that not all community members possess.
Ableism. Not all brains have same abilities and not all writers function at the same level of education or proficiency in the language in which they are writing. Some brains and ability levels require outside help or accommodations to achieve certain goals. The notion that all writers “should“ be able to perform certain functions independently or is a position that we disagree with wholeheartedly. There is a wealth of reasons why individuals can't "see" the issues in their writing without help. 
General Access Issues. All of these considerations exist within a larger system in which writers don't always have equal access to resources along the chain. For example, underrepresented minorities are less likely to be offered traditional publishing contracts, which places some, by default, into the indie author space, which inequitably creates upfront cost burdens that authors who do not suffer from systemic discrimination may have to incur.</a></label><br><a href="https://cdn.masto.host/dicecamp/media_attachments/files/113/067/719/084/962/959/original/de031dff09c7d6e7.png" rel="external">https://cdn.masto.host/dicecamp/media_attachments/files/113/067/719/084/962/959/original/de031dff09c7d6e7.png</a></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3113316">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Thought Punks (thoughtpunks@dice.camp)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2024 21:43:27 JST Thought Punks
Well, #NaNoWriMo is ruined now. Because WTF is this nonsense?
STOP MINIMIZING AND INFANTALIZING THE DISABLED. In case you didn't know it, NaNoWriMo, we kind of hate that.
Sauce: https://nanowrimo.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/29933455931412-What-is-NaNoWriMo-s-position-on-Artificial-Intelligence-AI
P.S. On the classism, that is unhinged in its detachment. For real, have they never met poor and working class writers and artists? We're MORE likely to work together.
#Writing #Writers #Disabled #Disability #Prejudice #Ableism #AI #Propaganda
In conversationabout 11 months ago from dice.camppermalink
Attachments
1. We also want to be clear in our belief that the categorical condemnation of Artificial Intelligence has classist and ableist undertones, and that questions around the use of AI tie to questions around privilege. Classism. Not all writers have the financial ability to hire humans to help at certain phases of their writing. For some writers, the decision to use AI is a practical, not an ideological, one. The financial ability to engage a human for feedback and review assumes a level of privilege that not all community members possess. Ableism. Not all brains have same abilities and not all writers function at the same level of education or proficiency in the language in which they are writing. Some brains and ability levels require outside help or accommodations to achieve certain goals. The notion that all writers “should“ be able to perform certain functions independently or is a position that we disagree with wholeheartedly. There is a wealth of reasons why individuals can't "see" the issues in their writing without help. General Access Issues. All of these considerations exist within a larger system in which writers don't always have equal access to resources along the chain. For example, underrepresented minorities are less likely to be offered traditional publishing contracts, which places some, by default, into the indie author space, which inequitably creates upfront cost burdens that authors who do not suffer from systemic discrimination may have to incur.
  https://cdn.masto.host/dicecamp/media_attachments/files/113/067/719/084/962/959/original/de031dff09c7d6e7.png
2. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice