@hailey In fact Rust in Linux is about the only one I could reasonably see using as the dependency management should be very different.

While userspace Rust is a non-starter for me as it's dependency-management is too broken by design to do security bumps. The added memory+race-safety of Safe Rust doesn't means the other security issues don't happen, specially when libraries also contains Unsafe Rust, C, C++, Assembly, …
And personally I'd rather have occasionally security issues trivially fixed in few hours than ones where it would take days at best but more likely never when lockfile-style packaging is involved.