Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://social.gibiris.org/objects/bad25f96-5966-d327-44d0-e87466870296">eibhear (eibhear@social.gibiris.org)'s status on Saturday, 31-Aug-2024 23:33:26 JST</a><a href="https://social.gibiris.org/profile/eibhear" title="eibhear@social.gibiris.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/theme/gnusocialjp/default-avatar-stream.png" width="48" height="48" alt="eibhear" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">eibhear</a><div><a href="https://bolha.us/@gutocarvalho/113056372200710858" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://bolha.us/users/gutocarvalho">@gutocarvalho</a><br></p>If you have question I'm here to help!<p>Ok. I'll bite.</p><p>I understand that one of the orders that twitter refused to follow was to appoint a legal representative of twitter in Brazil.</p><p>My questions are...</p><ul><li> Is my understanding correct?</li><li> If so, what purpose was this legal officer to serve?</li><li> Was the judge intending to imprison that person if twitter continued to refuse the orders? If so, in what way is that not a human rights violation? Who did the judge think was stupid enough to agree to such an appointment?</li></ul></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3594508#notice-7052017">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-08-31T23:33:26+09:00" title="Saturday, 31-Aug-2024 23:33:26 JST">about 3 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://social.gibiris.org/display/bad25f96-5966-d327-44d0-e87466870296" rel="external" title="Sent from social.gibiris.org via ActivityPub">social.gibiris.org</a></span></span><a href="https://social.gibiris.org/display/bad25f96-5966-d327-44d0-e87466870296">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3105855">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
eibhear (eibhear@social.gibiris.org)'s status on Saturday, 31-Aug-2024 23:33:26 JSTeibhear
in reply to
- /home/gutocarvalho :bolha:
@gutocarvalho
If you have question I'm here to help!
Ok. I'll bite.
I understand that one of the orders that twitter refused to follow was to appoint a legal representative of twitter in Brazil.
My questions are...
- Is my understanding correct?
- If so, what purpose was this legal officer to serve?
- Was the judge intending to imprison that person if twitter continued to refuse the orders? If so, in what way is that not a human rights violation? Who did the judge think was stupid enough to agree to such an appointment?
In conversationabout 3 months ago from social.gibiris.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice