Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/users/joeo10/statuses/113052578251110255">Joe Ortiz (joeo10@mastodon.sdf.org)'s status on Saturday, 31-Aug-2024 04:17:30 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/@joeo10" title="joeo10@mastodon.sdf.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/92668-48-20230128144844.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Joe Ortiz" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Joe Ortiz</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/@joeo10/113046618582298193" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p>Here's <a href="https://mastodon.lawprofs.org/@ericgoldman">@ericgoldman</a>: </p><p>"Unless the 3rd Circuit en banc quickly and decisively rejects this opinion, it will be celebrated by other judges eager to blow up Section 230 (of which there are many). As a result, I expect this opinion provides another hard shove towards the impending and seemingly inevitable end of <a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/Section230" rel="tag">#Section230</a>–and the <a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/tags/Internet" rel="tag">#Internet</a> as we know it." </p><p><a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/08/bonkers-opinion-repeals-section-230-in-the-third-circuit-anderson-v-tiktok.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/08/bonkers-opinion-repeals-section-230-in-the-third-circuit-anderson-v-tiktok.htm</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3585804#notice-7045480">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-08-31T04:17:30+09:00" title="Saturday, 31-Aug-2024 04:17:30 JST">about 3 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/@joeo10/113052578251110255" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.sdf.org via ActivityPub">mastodon.sdf.org</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.sdf.org/@joeo10/113052578251110255">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: blog.ericgoldman.org</div><h5><a href="https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/08/bonkers-opinion-repeals-section-230-in-the-third-circuit-anderson-v-tiktok.htm">Bonkers Opinion Repeals Section 230 In the Third Circuit-Anderson v. TikTok - Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog</a></h5><div> from <span>Eric Goldman</span></div></header><div>This decision is bonkers. The majority implies that any effort to curate third-party content automatically converts the third-party content into first-party content so that it no longer qualifies for Section 230 immunity. Because every UGC service necessarily curates every content...</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Joe Ortiz (joeo10@mastodon.sdf.org)'s status on Saturday, 31-Aug-2024 04:17:30 JSTJoe Ortiz
in reply to
- Eric Goldman ☑ (he/him)
Here's @ericgoldman:
"Unless the 3rd Circuit en banc quickly and decisively rejects this opinion, it will be celebrated by other judges eager to blow up Section 230 (of which there are many). As a result, I expect this opinion provides another hard shove towards the impending and seemingly inevitable end of #Section230–and the #Internet as we know it."
https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2024/08/bonkers-opinion-repeals-section-230-in-the-third-circuit-anderson-v-tiktok.htm
In conversationabout 3 months ago from mastodon.sdf.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: blog.ericgoldman.org
  Bonkers Opinion Repeals Section 230 In the Third Circuit-Anderson v. TikTok - Technology & Marketing Law Blog
  from Eric Goldman
  This decision is bonkers. The majority implies that any effort to curate third-party content automatically converts the third-party content into first-party content so that it no longer qualifies for Section 230 immunity. Because every UGC service necessarily curates every content...

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice