Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://journa.host/users/chrisgeidner/statuses/113035784540215828">Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Wednesday, 28-Aug-2024 08:39:30 JST</a><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner" title="chrisgeidner@journa.host"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/75697-48-20240516135537.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Chris Geidner" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Chris Geidner</a><div><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/113035760010390395" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>Here's the ACLU brief, calling on the Supreme Court to vacate the Sixth Circuit's ruling from last year holding that the Tennessee ban is likely constitutional: <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-477/323499/20240827143014850_No.%2023-477%20Brief%20for%20Respondents%20ISO%20Petitioner.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-477/323499/20240827143014850_No.%2023-477%20Brief%20for%20Respondents%20ISO%20Petitioner.pdf</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3578183#notice-7020415">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-08-28T08:39:30+09:00" title="Wednesday, 28-Aug-2024 08:39:30 JST">about 9 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/113035784540215828" rel="external" title="Sent from journa.host via ActivityPub">journa.host</a></span></span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/113035784540215828">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3091263">If left uncorrected, the Sixth Circuit’s reasoning
will have far-reaching consequences. It will effectively
immunize all forms of government discrimination
against transgender people from meaningful
constitutional scrutiny. And it will force the families
at the center of this case (and countless others like
them) to lose the very medical care that has allowed
their children to grow and thrive. This Court should
vacate the Sixth Circuit’s misguided decision, reaffirm
that all sex classifications receive heightened scrutiny,
and remand for further proceedings or reverse the
judgment.</a></label><br><a href="https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/113/035/784/257/479/253/original/42d953a9bf0b048a.png" rel="external">https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/113/035/784/257/479/253/original/42d953a9bf0b048a.png</a></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3091264">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Wednesday, 28-Aug-2024 08:39:30 JST Chris Geidner
in reply to
Here's the ACLU brief, calling on the Supreme Court to vacate the Sixth Circuit's ruling from last year holding that the Tennessee ban is likely constitutional: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-477/323499/20240827143014850_No.%2023-477%20Brief%20for%20Respondents%20ISO%20Petitioner.pdf
In conversationabout 9 months ago from journa.hostpermalink
Attachments
1. If left uncorrected, the Sixth Circuit’s reasoning will have far-reaching consequences. It will effectively immunize all forms of government discrimination against transgender people from meaningful constitutional scrutiny. And it will force the families at the center of this case (and countless others like them) to lose the very medical care that has allowed their children to grow and thrive. This Court should vacate the Sixth Circuit’s misguided decision, reaffirm that all sex classifications receive heightened scrutiny, and remand for further proceedings or reverse the judgment.
  https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/113/035/784/257/479/253/original/42d953a9bf0b048a.png
2. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice