Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://techpolicy.social/users/ginahelfrich/statuses/113021842904054028">Gina Helfrich, Ph.D. (ginahelfrich@techpolicy.social)'s status on Sunday, 25-Aug-2024 19:52:27 JST</a><a href="https://techpolicy.social/@ginahelfrich" title="ginahelfrich@techpolicy.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/158294-48-20230807124200.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Gina Helfrich, Ph.D." style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Gina Helfrich, Ph.D.</a></section><article><p>Some good news out of the UK:</p><p>Artificial intelligence and algorithmic tools used by central government are to be published on a public register after warnings they can contain “entrenched” racism and bias.</p><p>Officials confirmed this weekend that tools challenged by campaigners over alleged secrecy and a risk of bias will be named shortly. </p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/aug/25/register-aims-to-quash-fears-over-racist-and-biased-ai-tools-used-on-uk-public" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/aug/25/register-aims-to-quash-fears-over-racist-and-biased-ai-tools-used-on-uk-public</a></p><p><a href="https://techpolicy.social/tags/AI" rel="tag">#AI</a> <a href="https://techpolicy.social/tags/ResponsibleAI" rel="tag">#ResponsibleAI</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3567011#notice-6999587">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-08-25T19:52:27+09:00" title="Sunday, 25-Aug-2024 19:52:27 JST">about 3 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://techpolicy.social/@ginahelfrich/113021842904054028" rel="external" title="Sent from techpolicy.social via ActivityPub">techpolicy.social</a></span></span><a href="https://techpolicy.social/@ginahelfrich/113021842904054028">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.guim.co.uk</div><h5><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/aug/25/register-aims-to-quash-fears-over-racist-and-biased-ai-tools-used-on-uk-public#AI">Warnings AI tools used by government on UK public are ‘racist and biased’</a></h5><div> from <span>https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jon-ungoed-thomas</span></div></header><div>Transparency campaigners welcome government move to publish details of system algorithms</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Gina Helfrich, Ph.D. (ginahelfrich@techpolicy.social)'s status on Sunday, 25-Aug-2024 19:52:27 JST Gina Helfrich, Ph.D.
Some good news out of the UK:
Artificial intelligence and algorithmic tools used by central government are to be published on a public register after warnings they can contain “entrenched” racism and bias.
Officials confirmed this weekend that tools challenged by campaigners over alleged secrecy and a risk of bias will be named shortly.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/aug/25/register-aims-to-quash-fears-over-racist-and-biased-ai-tools-used-on-uk-public
#AI #ResponsibleAI
In conversationabout 3 months ago from techpolicy.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.guim.co.uk
  Warnings AI tools used by government on UK public are ‘racist and biased’
  from https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jon-ungoed-thomas
  Transparency campaigners welcome government move to publish details of system algorithms

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice