Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mato.social/users/josemurilo/statuses/112950296965239485">Ecologia Digital (josemurilo@mato.social)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Aug-2024 08:44:07 JST</a><a href="https://mato.social/@josemurilo" title="josemurilo@mato.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/206894-48-20231102031728.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Ecologia Digital" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Ecologia Digital</a></section><article><p>"The rise of <a href="https://mato.social/tags/disinformation" rel="tag">#disinformation</a> online and its impact on deliberative democracies is among the more consequential socio-political and technological problems of our times. However, a government-controlled body [in <a href="https://mato.social/tags/India" rel="tag">#India</a>] that acts as the primary arbiter of online news about itself is prima facie an act in bad faith, where the government can unilaterally determine what online content about it should be available."<br><a href="https://www.techpolicy.press/india-and-taiwans-divergent-paths-to-combat-online-disinformation/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.techpolicy.press/india-and-taiwans-divergent-paths-to-combat-online-disinformation/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3511304#notice-6897481">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-08-13T08:44:07+09:00" title="Tuesday, 13-Aug-2024 08:44:07 JST">about 3 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mato.social/@josemurilo/112950296965239485" rel="external" title="Sent from mato.social via ActivityPub">mato.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mato.social/@josemurilo/112950296965239485">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.sanity.io</div><h5><a href="https://www.techpolicy.press/india-and-taiwans-divergent-paths-to-combat-online-disinformation/">India and Taiwan's Divergent Paths to Combat Online Disinformation | TechPolicy.Press</a></h5><div> from <span>http://techpolicy.press/author/amber-sinha</span></div></header><div>Amber Sinha compares India's Fact Check Unit with Taiwan's 'whole of society' approach to fighting disinformation.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Ecologia Digital (josemurilo@mato.social)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Aug-2024 08:44:07 JST Ecologia Digital
"The rise of #disinformation online and its impact on deliberative democracies is among the more consequential socio-political and technological problems of our times. However, a government-controlled body [in #India] that acts as the primary arbiter of online news about itself is prima facie an act in bad faith, where the government can unilaterally determine what online content about it should be available."
https://www.techpolicy.press/india-and-taiwans-divergent-paths-to-combat-online-disinformation/
In conversationabout 3 months ago from mato.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.sanity.io
  India and Taiwan's Divergent Paths to Combat Online Disinformation | TechPolicy.Press
  from http://techpolicy.press/author/amber-sinha
  Amber Sinha compares India's Fact Check Unit with Taiwan's 'whole of society' approach to fighting disinformation.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice