Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://journa.host/users/chrisgeidner/statuses/112940581898029014">Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Sunday, 11-Aug-2024 09:59:04 JST</a><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner" title="chrisgeidner@journa.host"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/75697-48-20240516135537.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Chris Geidner" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Chris Geidner</a><div><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/112939798439419275" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>UPDATE: Texas has already gone back to the Supreme Court in the student loan cases — with Texas SG Aaron Nielson asking the court to end the SAVE Plan permanently on the shadow docket via a "summary" order. <a href="https://www.lawdork.com/i/147559088/then-theres-scotus" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.lawdork.com/i/147559088/then-theres-scotus</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3502631#notice-6882016">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-08-11T09:59:04+09:00" title="Sunday, 11-Aug-2024 09:59:04 JST">about 10 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/112940581898029014" rel="external" title="Sent from journa.host via ActivityPub">journa.host</a></span></span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/112940581898029014">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3026613">Texas Solicitor General Aaron Nielson filed a letter with the Supreme Court on Saturday, noting that the Eighth Circuit’s injunction “negate[s] the need for emergency relief from this Court so long as that injunction remains in effect,” but still seeking Supreme Court review — either by having the court “summarily order the district court to vacate the SAVE Plan“ or setting the case for argument — based on the application already filed.When Nielson asks for SCOTUS to “summarily order the district court to vacate the SAVE Plan,” it’s important to understand what that means. Neither the district court did nor the Tenth Circuit vacated the SAVE Plan. No court has done so.So, what Texas is asking the court to do is to stop considering cases at all on the merits docket, get rid of all pretense, and actually resolve a merits case — involving a different program based on application of a different law — because Nielson thinks Texas should obviously win based on the HEROES Act case.</a></label><br><a href="https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/112/940/581/654/876/944/original/a93d9bddc684871d.png" rel="external">https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/112/940/581/654/876/944/original/a93d9bddc684871d.png</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: substackcdn.com</div><h5><a href="https://www.lawdork.com/p/student-loan-save-eighth-circuit-injunction?open=false#%C2%A7then-theres-scotus">An appeals court blocked a Biden student loan plan — after another one had let it go forward</a></h5><div> from <span>Chris Geidner</span></div></header><div>The Eighth Circuit issued an unsigned order Friday blocking the Saving on a Valuable Education, or SAVE, student loan program — and other related relief.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Sunday, 11-Aug-2024 09:59:04 JST Chris Geidner
in reply to
UPDATE: Texas has already gone back to the Supreme Court in the student loan cases — with Texas SG Aaron Nielson asking the court to end the SAVE Plan permanently on the shadow docket via a "summary" order. https://www.lawdork.com/i/147559088/then-theres-scotus
In conversationabout 10 months ago from journa.hostpermalink
Attachments
1. Texas Solicitor General Aaron Nielson filed a letter with the Supreme Court on Saturday, noting that the Eighth Circuit’s injunction “negate[s] the need for emergency relief from this Court so long as that injunction remains in effect,” but still seeking Supreme Court review — either by having the court “summarily order the district court to vacate the SAVE Plan“ or setting the case for argument — based on the application already filed. When Nielson asks for SCOTUS to “summarily order the district court to vacate the SAVE Plan,” it’s important to understand what that means. Neither the district court did nor the Tenth Circuit vacated the SAVE Plan. No court has done so. So, what Texas is asking the court to do is to stop considering cases at all on the merits docket, get rid of all pretense, and actually resolve a merits case — involving a different program based on application of a different law — because Nielson thinks Texas should obviously win based on the HEROES Act case.
  https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/112/940/581/654/876/944/original/a93d9bddc684871d.png
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: substackcdn.com
  An appeals court blocked a Biden student loan plan — after another one had let it go forward
  from Chris Geidner
  The Eighth Circuit issued an unsigned order Friday blocking the Saving on a Valuable Education, or SAVE, student loan program — and other related relief.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice