@InvictusManeo @PraxisOfEvil @Witch_Hunter_Siegfired @Constantine2nd @leespringfield1903 @Will2Power @justnormalkorean Given what we’ve established, we’re in a better position to make an informed decision of how ourguys “ought” to approach the outward displays of Hitler love.
By asking someone to stop poasting Swastikas, we’re putting a significant damper on their ability to counteract the evil sorcery; at least that’s what it would “feel like”; it comes across like taking status away from them. Whether it’s justifiably “worth it” in the big-picture, doesn’t mitigate the subjective experience of one being told he must “hide Hitler under a basket”.
So, if it’s justifiably worth it, then it would be justifiably worth it to offer them something of comparable value. A fair trade. While I can conceive of this, I don’t have any ideas what that might actually be. But the possibility is there.

A parallel point to consider; do jews *want* us to post NatSoc imagery ? If it’s counterproductive to do so, they’d stand to benefit from inducing people to “act against their own interests” in this way.
That being said, in my experience the jews are almost unanimously opposed to outward displays of Hitler (at least that aren’t on their own terms).
But here’s the deal with; whether they’re aware of it or not, jews’ displays of Hitler are done in such a way, that he’s usually always being associated with Low-Status. As such, *online spergs that come across as Low-Status in the eyes of the jews, are carrying water for their propaganda push*.
I think this is probably the best way to approach it, with accounts that we deem “shouldn’t” be sullying Hitler’s image. If we approach it tactfully, I think sincere White Men will realize the wisdom in this.