Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mstdn.social/users/Laloofah/statuses/112889230164324703">Laloofah (laloofah@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 02-Aug-2024 09:33:33 JST</a><a href="https://mstdn.social/@Laloofah" title="laloofah@mstdn.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/42298-48-20241123134023.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Laloofah" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Laloofah</a><div><a href="https://mstdn.social/@Laloofah/112889222994637575" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>2/2 And in 1949, Waite wrote, “Jefferson’s Wall of Separation: What and Where?” in support of the separation of church &amp; state (the screenshot below is its final paragraph):<br><a href="https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1210/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1210/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3462654#notice-6806286">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-08-02T09:33:33+09:00" title="Friday, 02-Aug-2024 09:33:33 JST">about 6 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mstdn.social/@Laloofah/112889230164324703" rel="external" title="Sent from mstdn.social via ActivityPub">mstdn.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mstdn.social/@Laloofah/112889230164324703">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2987815">Text: Jefferson’s phrase was a shout of triumph after a winning fight against new-world remnants of old-world ecclesiasticism. In Cantwell vs. Connecticut [81] we find a summary of that great victory in words more likely to be useful under twentieth century conditions : “The constitutional inhibition of legislation on the subject of religion has a double aspect. On the one hand, it forestalls compulsion by law of the acceptance of any creed or the practice of any form of worship. Freedom of conscience and freedom to adhere to such religious organization or form of worship as the individual may choose cannot be restricted by law. On the other hand, it safeguards the free exercise of the chosen form of religion.” [82]
Footnotes follow; the 2 cited in this excerpt are:
“81. 310 U.S. 296 (1940).
82. Id. at 303; Justice Roberts for the unanimous Court.” 
[Not the SCOTUS Justice Roberts, it probably goes without saying!]</a></label><br><a href="https://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/112/889/227/881/986/154/original/662af5f97c05d2e7.jpeg" rel="external">https://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/112/889/227/881/986/154/original/662af5f97c05d2e7.jpeg</a></li><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1210/">Jefferson's Wall of Separation: What and Where</a></h5><div> from <span>Edward F. Waite</span></div></header><div>By Edward F. Waite, Published on 01/01/49</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Laloofah (laloofah@mstdn.social)'s status on Friday, 02-Aug-2024 09:33:33 JST Laloofah
in reply to
2/2 And in 1949, Waite wrote, “Jefferson’s Wall of Separation: What and Where?” in support of the separation of church & state (the screenshot below is its final paragraph):
https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/1210/
In conversationabout 6 months ago from mstdn.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Text: Jefferson’s phrase was a shout of triumph after a winning fight against new-world remnants of old-world ecclesiasticism. In Cantwell vs. Connecticut [81] we find a summary of that great victory in words more likely to be useful under twentieth century conditions : “The constitutional inhibition of legislation on the subject of religion has a double aspect. On the one hand, it forestalls compulsion by law of the acceptance of any creed or the practice of any form of worship. Freedom of conscience and freedom to adhere to such religious organization or form of worship as the individual may choose cannot be restricted by law. On the other hand, it safeguards the free exercise of the chosen form of religion.” [82] Footnotes follow; the 2 cited in this excerpt are: “81. 310 U.S. 296 (1940). 82. Id. at 303; Justice Roberts for the unanimous Court.” [Not the SCOTUS Justice Roberts, it probably goes without saying!]
  https://media.mstdn.social/media_attachments/files/112/889/227/881/986/154/original/662af5f97c05d2e7.jpeg
2. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  Jefferson's Wall of Separation: What and Where
  from Edward F. Waite
  By Edward F. Waite, Published on 01/01/49

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice