Embed Notice

@magitweeter @passenger Yes.

Since "bad" is not a very well-defined term, the more precise version of what I'm saying is that there is no plausible way that, as a result of voting blue instead of red or third-party or not-at-all, you *cause a harm* in any meaningful sense of cause (i.e. not butterfly-effect type things).

Any harm that does happen was going to happen independent of your action, and individually you did not have the power to stop it.