Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://bae.st/objects/ab7be39a-dfc8-46b3-b01c-ed653cf491a7">:not_the_confederate_flag: :senko_dance: Otso :senko_dance: :verified: (mactonite@bae.st)'s status on Thursday, 25-Jul-2024 23:36:29 JST</a><a href="https://bae.st/users/mactonite" title="mactonite@bae.st"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/9041-48-20220906115657.webp" width="48" height="48" alt=":not_the_confederate_flag: :senko_dance: Otso :senko_dance: :verified:" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">:not_the_confederate_flag: :senko_dance: Otso :senko_dance: :verified:</a><div><a href="https://poa.st/objects/3c52abc5-6f30-4de8-99ba-36d47d83779a" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><a href="https://poa.st/users/RatPoster">@RatPoster</a> it's not possible to steal digital media because it's not scarce, downloading a game for free doesn't subtract money from the developer (unfortunately). on the contrary: intellectual "property rights" are actually a violation of real property rights, the right to your own physical computer and being able to write what you want on it. <a href="https://yewtu.be/watch?v=4xKjHHzLUQQ">https://yewtu.be/watch?v=4xKjHHzLUQQ</a></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3425807#notice-6738168">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-07-25T23:36:29+09:00" title="Thursday, 25-Jul-2024 23:36:29 JST">about 3 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://bae.st/objects/ab7be39a-dfc8-46b3-b01c-ed653cf491a7" rel="external" title="Sent from bae.st via ActivityPub">bae.st</a></span></span><a href="https://bae.st/objects/ab7be39a-dfc8-46b3-b01c-ed653cf491a7">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: yewtu.be</div><h5><a href="https://yewtu.be/watch?v=4xKjHHzLUQQ">Why Artists Shouldn't Own Their Art</a></h5><div></div></header><div>I explain why Intellectual Property rights are actually criminal monopoly grants and why copyrights and patents should be entirely abolished. I debunk every pro-IP argument ever and explain how we will see more technological and artistic development without copyrights and patents.Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTf0py7ryuSldOsDm4abSsg/joinOr buy me a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/liquidzuluIntellectual property (IP) refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions, literary and artistic works, and symbols, names, and images used in commerce. IP is protected by laws, such as copyright, trademark, and patent laws, which give creators and owners of IP the exclusive right to use and benefit from their creations. However, the concept of intellectual property rights has been the subject of much debate and criticism.One major problem with IP is that it is a form of monopoly. Copyright and patent laws grant creators and owners of IP exclusive rights to use and profit from their creations, which can give them a monopoly on certain products and ideas. This can stifle competition and prevent others from using and improving upon the IP.Another issue with IP is that it can be used to restrict access to knowledge and information. Copyright laws, in particular, can be used to limit the distribution and use of creative works. This can prevent people from accessing and using essential knowledge and information.Furthermore, IP laws can be used to suppress freedom of expression and creativity. Copyright laws, for example, can be used to censor and silence artists and writers. This can have a chilling effect on free speech and artistic expression.In addition, IP laws can be a barrier to innovation and progress. Patents, in particular, can prevent others from using and building upon existing inventions and technologies. This can slow down the pace of innovation.Moreover, IP laws can be unfair and unequal. Many people may not have access to the legal and financial resources necessary to enforce their IP rights. This can lead to a situation where powerful individuals and companies are able to enforce their IP rights, while others are unable to do so.Overall, intellectual property rights can be problematic and have negative consequences for society. They can create monopolies, restrict access to knowledge and information, suppress freedom of expression and creativity, hinder innovation and progress, and be unfair and unequal. Instead of relying on IP laws, we should consider alternative ways of rewarding and incentivizing creativity and innovation.---See the script along with any reference material here: https://gist.github.com/LiquidZulu/a269df658060c9e9e358c3ad43b6b736Footnotes:[1]  @TheRageaholic, "The Public (Domain) is An Ass"[2] Hans-Hermann Hoppe (2001), "On Time Preference, Government, and the Process of Decivilization" in idem. "Democracy - The God That Failed: The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy and Natural Order"[3]  @AcademicAgent, "Why I Support Intellectual Property Rights"[4]  @Nielsio, "Law and Economics (by Hans-Hermann Hoppe) - Introduction to Austrian Economics, 11of11," t. 1:13:20[5]  @TheFederalistSociety, "Intellectual Property: A Frist Principles Debate," t. 04:53[6]  @ReasonTV, "Abolish Copyrights and Patents? A Soho Forum Debate," t. 39:00[7]  @Uniquenameosaurus, "You Hate all these Companies for the SAME Reason," t. 00:28[8] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63zC7yqV_gk[9]  @Nielsio, "The Myth of the Free Market Cartel | by Murray N. Rothbard"[10]  @KirbyFerguson, "Everything is a Remix"[11]  @Uniquenameosaurus, "Why Creators Shouldn't Own their Creations (And Why its Good for them too)"[12]  @AdamNeely, "The Grotesque Legacy of Music as Property"Chapters:
00:00 Intellectual Property Rights Are Strictly Impossible
03:05 How Intellectual Monopoly Implies The Destruction of Civilisation
11:40 Ideas Remain Scarce
16:12 How Intellectual Monopoly Warps Technological Development
20:47 Copyright as a Tool of Censorship, and Patents as a Tool For The Construction of Cartels
29:53 How Intellectual Monopoly Stifles Creativity
41:10 Against The Labour Theory of Property and Ayn RandMusic used: https://pastebin.com/Zccwd3fNSocial media:
https://www.subscribestar.com/liquidzulu
https://discord.com/invite/A9NKzQShPA
https://liquidzulu.github.io/
https://twitter.com/liquid2uluCrypto:
BTC - bc1q9qlp7mr74d59aw8aznzfwphaw8gquee6p7mstt
ETH - 0xe4Ff56c3c77348793E751618ABf8Cf979aDCa7EB[LICENSE INFORMATION: I do not consider intellectual property to be a valid form of property (duh), therefore it would be unethical for me to enforce the attribution requirement of the CC license that this video should be licensed under. Furthermore, if I have made a mistake and licensed under the standard YouTube license please let me know and I will amend it]</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
:not_the_confederate_flag: :senko_dance: Otso :senko_dance: :verified: (mactonite@bae.st)'s status on Thursday, 25-Jul-2024 23:36:29 JST:not_the_confederate_flag: :senko_dance: Otso :senko_dance: :verified:
in reply to
- Rat Poster
@RatPoster it's not possible to steal digital media because it's not scarce, downloading a game for free doesn't subtract money from the developer (unfortunately). on the contrary: intellectual "property rights" are actually a violation of real property rights, the right to your own physical computer and being able to write what you want on it. https://yewtu.be/watch?v=4xKjHHzLUQQ
In conversationabout 3 months ago from bae.stpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: yewtu.be
  Why Artists Shouldn't Own Their Art
  I explain why Intellectual Property rights are actually criminal monopoly grants and why copyrights and patents should be entirely abolished. I debunk every pro-IP argument ever and explain how we will see more technological and artistic development without copyrights and patents. Join this channel to get access to perks: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTf0py7ryuSldOsDm4abSsg/join Or buy me a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/liquidzulu Intellectual property (IP) refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions, literary and artistic works, and symbols, names, and images used in commerce. IP is protected by laws, such as copyright, trademark, and patent laws, which give creators and owners of IP the exclusive right to use and benefit from their creations. However, the concept of intellectual property rights has been the subject of much debate and criticism. One major problem with IP is that it is a form of monopoly. Copyright and patent laws grant creators and owners of IP exclusive rights to use and profit from their creations, which can give them a monopoly on certain products and ideas. This can stifle competition and prevent others from using and improving upon the IP. Another issue with IP is that it can be used to restrict access to knowledge and information. Copyright laws, in particular, can be used to limit the distribution and use of creative works. This can prevent people from accessing and using essential knowledge and information. Furthermore, IP laws can be used to suppress freedom of expression and creativity. Copyright laws, for example, can be used to censor and silence artists and writers. This can have a chilling effect on free speech and artistic expression. In addition, IP laws can be a barrier to innovation and progress. Patents, in particular, can prevent others from using and building upon existing inventions and technologies. This can slow down the pace of innovation. Moreover, IP laws can be unfair and unequal. Many people may not have access to the legal and financial resources necessary to enforce their IP rights. This can lead to a situation where powerful individuals and companies are able to enforce their IP rights, while others are unable to do so. Overall, intellectual property rights can be problematic and have negative consequences for society. They can create monopolies, restrict access to knowledge and information, suppress freedom of expression and creativity, hinder innovation and progress, and be unfair and unequal. Instead of relying on IP laws, we should consider alternative ways of rewarding and incentivizing creativity and innovation. --- See the script along with any reference material here: https://gist.github.com/LiquidZulu/a269df658060c9e9e358c3ad43b6b736 Footnotes: [1] @TheRageaholic, "The Public (Domain) is An Ass" [2] Hans-Hermann Hoppe (2001), "On Time Preference, Government, and the Process of Decivilization" in idem. "Democracy - The God That Failed: The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy and Natural Order" [3] @AcademicAgent, "Why I Support Intellectual Property Rights" [4] @Nielsio, "Law and Economics (by Hans-Hermann Hoppe) - Introduction to Austrian Economics, 11of11," t. 1:13:20 [5] @TheFederalistSociety, "Intellectual Property: A Frist Principles Debate," t. 04:53 [6] @ReasonTV, "Abolish Copyrights and Patents? A Soho Forum Debate," t. 39:00 [7] @Uniquenameosaurus, "You Hate all these Companies for the SAME Reason," t. 00:28 [8] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63zC7yqV_gk [9] @Nielsio, "The Myth of the Free Market Cartel | by Murray N. Rothbard" [10] @KirbyFerguson, "Everything is a Remix" [11] @Uniquenameosaurus, "Why Creators Shouldn't Own their Creations (And Why its Good for them too)" [12] @AdamNeely, "The Grotesque Legacy of Music as Property" Chapters: 00:00 Intellectual Property Rights Are Strictly Impossible 03:05 How Intellectual Monopoly Implies The Destruction of Civilisation 11:40 Ideas Remain Scarce 16:12 How Intellectual Monopoly Warps Technological Development 20:47 Copyright as a Tool of Censorship, and Patents as a Tool For The Construction of Cartels 29:53 How Intellectual Monopoly Stifles Creativity 41:10 Against The Labour Theory of Property and Ayn Rand Music used: https://pastebin.com/Zccwd3fN Social media: https://www.subscribestar.com/liquidzulu https://discord.com/invite/A9NKzQShPA https://liquidzulu.github.io/ https://twitter.com/liquid2ulu Crypto: BTC - bc1q9qlp7mr74d59aw8aznzfwphaw8gquee6p7mstt ETH - 0xe4Ff56c3c77348793E751618ABf8Cf979aDCa7EB [LICENSE INFORMATION: I do not consider intellectual property to be a valid form of property (duh), therefore it would be unethical for me to enforce the attribution requirement of the CC license that this video should be licensed under. Furthermore, if I have made a mistake and licensed under the standard YouTube license please let me know and I will amend it]