Embed Notice

So we have nonsense like this NYT piece, where their columnists are asked to select alternatives to Harris, ranking them by how "exciting" they are. (Despite the huge excitement for Harris in the real world, the NYT decides she's pretty dull, really.) They also decide that EVERY other rando they picked — some of whom have already endorsed her — is more electable than she is. Including some you've probably never heard of. It's childish. They are not serious people.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/07/22/opinion/best-worst-candidates-to-replace-biden.html