@maija There any many "bsd" licenses and they all suck and ignore many problems that face software, plus they don't defend freedom.

To license non-trivial software under say BSD 3-clause is to write proprietary software without getting paid merely to ensure that more freedom gets taken from YOU (via proprietary blowback) and also other people as well.

Anyone who puts any BSD license on software lights a beacon that they're a proprietary cuck and actually enjoys their and others freedom being taken away (if would be fine if it was just them, but it impacts other people) and proprietary software companies gladly oblige.


Public domain is not a license and actually releasing something to the public domain is not easy - the only dedication that has a chance of being valid worldwide is the (currently incomplete); https://wpdd.info/

Strangely, proprietary software companies tend to be less willing to use public domain software, even though the requirements drop down to pretty much nothing - but I guess the proprietary masters love that kick of infringing the BSD 3-clause's terms and therefore losing their license, but still having nothing happen.