Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://journa.host/users/chrisgeidner/statuses/112730605108336202">Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Friday, 05-Jul-2024 08:36:20 JST</a><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner" title="chrisgeidner@journa.host"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/75697-48-20240516135537.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Chris Geidner" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Chris Geidner</a></section><article><p>Judge John Broomes, a Trump appointee, issued a nationwide Title IX rule injunction covering all children of "Moms for Liberty" members this week. That's bad enough, but the procedural/notice mess he made of it is also really absurd: <a href="https://www.lawdork.com/i/146289012/the-latest-title-ix-rule-ruling" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.lawdork.com/i/146289012/the-latest-title-ix-rule-ruling</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3332137#notice-6562262">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-07-05T08:36:20+09:00" title="Friday, 05-Jul-2024 08:36:20 JST">about 5 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/112730605108336202" rel="external" title="Sent from journa.host via ActivityPub">journa.host</a></span></span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/112730605108336202">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2868104">Despite issuing an injunction of nationwide scope on July 2, Broomes has no list of what schools are covered by it. Instead, the injunction states, “Plaintiff Organizations are directed to file a notice in the record identifying the schools which their members or their members’ children, as applicable, attend on or before July 15, 2024.”In other words, there are schools that are, technically, the subject of this injunction currently yet have no notice of such. Yes, it’s an injunction against the federal government and regarding a rule that doesn’t go into effect until August 1. Nonetheless, it goes to show how slipshod this order is that there could be countless schools whose legal obligations were altered by the order and yet the judge doesn’t even know what schools they are. Further, those schools were provided no notice that the litigation was even happening, let alone that their obligations could be affected by it. The same goes for states responsible for overseeing those schools</a></label><br><a href="https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/112/730/604/895/949/560/original/d77b690fbc0fcd61.png" rel="external">https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/112/730/604/895/949/560/original/d77b690fbc0fcd61.png</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: substackcdn.com</div><h5><a href="https://www.lawdork.com/p/trans-healthcare-anti-discrimination?open=false#%C2%A7the-latest-title-ix-rule-ruling">Trans healthcare anti-discrimination rule blocked nationwide as other LGBTQ rule challenges proceed</a></h5><div> from <span>Chris Geidner</span></div></header><div>Some aspects of the rule enforcing Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act go into effect on Friday. Also: Another Title IX rule injunction.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Friday, 05-Jul-2024 08:36:20 JST Chris Geidner
Judge John Broomes, a Trump appointee, issued a nationwide Title IX rule injunction covering all children of "Moms for Liberty" members this week. That's bad enough, but the procedural/notice mess he made of it is also really absurd: https://www.lawdork.com/i/146289012/the-latest-title-ix-rule-ruling
In conversationabout 5 months ago from journa.hostpermalink
Attachments
1. Despite issuing an injunction of nationwide scope on July 2, Broomes has no list of what schools are covered by it. Instead, the injunction states, “Plaintiff Organizations are directed to file a notice in the record identifying the schools which their members or their members’ children, as applicable, attend on or before July 15, 2024.” In other words, there are schools that are, technically, the subject of this injunction currently yet have no notice of such. Yes, it’s an injunction against the federal government and regarding a rule that doesn’t go into effect until August 1. Nonetheless, it goes to show how slipshod this order is that there could be countless schools whose legal obligations were altered by the order and yet the judge doesn’t even know what schools they are. Further, those schools were provided no notice that the litigation was even happening, let alone that their obligations could be affected by it. The same goes for states responsible for overseeing those schools
  https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/112/730/604/895/949/560/original/d77b690fbc0fcd61.png
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: substackcdn.com
  Trans healthcare anti-discrimination rule blocked nationwide as other LGBTQ rule challenges proceed
  from Chris Geidner
  Some aspects of the rule enforcing Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act go into effect on Friday. Also: Another Title IX rule injunction.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice