Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://fosstodon.org/users/AkaSci/statuses/112713391824972039">AkaSci 🛰️ (akasci@fosstodon.org)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jul-2024 08:24:18 JST</a><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@AkaSci" title="akasci@fosstodon.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/20805-48-20221219024513.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="AkaSci 🛰️" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">AkaSci 🛰️</a><div><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@AkaSci/112713234944078475" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>From <a href="https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol78/iss1/4/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol78/iss1/4/</a> — “Chief Justice John Roberts: Institutionalist or Hubris-in-Chief?” by Eric J. Segall, Georgia State University College of Law in 2021 -</p><p>"Across the vast landscape of constitutional law, Roberts has distorted precedent and ignored text and history to further his own policy preferences.</p><p>A master of the long game and the catchy sound bite, hubris, not institutionalism, most defines the Chief Justice of the United States."</p><p><a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/SCOTUS" rel="tag">#SCOTUS</a><br>3/n</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3318499#notice-6538184">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-07-02T08:24:18+09:00" title="Tuesday, 02-Jul-2024 08:24:18 JST">about 5 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@AkaSci/112713391824972039" rel="external" title="Sent from fosstodon.org via ActivityPub">fosstodon.org</a></span></span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@AkaSci/112713391824972039">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2855814">Abstract and conclusion sections from the essay</a></label><br><a href="https://cdn.fosstodon.org/media_attachments/files/112/713/384/943/656/906/original/d514b1bd0830b83d.png" rel="external">https://cdn.fosstodon.org/media_attachments/files/112/713/384/943/656/906/original/d514b1bd0830b83d.png</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu</div><h5><a href="https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol78/iss1/4/">Chief Justice John Roberts: Institutionalist or Hubris-in-Chief?</a></h5><div> from <span>Eric J. Segall</span></div></header><div>The conventional wisdom among Supreme Court scholars and commentators is that Chief Justice John Roberts is an institutionalist who cares deeply about both his personal legacy and the Supreme Court’s prestige over time. This essay challenges that belief. While the Chief certainly cares about how the Court is perceived by the public, as do most of the justices, what most defines Roberts is his hubris—not a concern for the Court’s legitimacy or even his own place in history. Across the vast landscape of constitutional law, Roberts has distorted precedent and ignored text and history to further his own policy preferences. A master of the long game and the catchy sound bite, hubris, not institutionalism, most defines the Chief Justice of the United States.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
AkaSci 🛰️ (akasci@fosstodon.org)'s status on Tuesday, 02-Jul-2024 08:24:18 JST AkaSci 🛰️
in reply to
From https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr-online/vol78/iss1/4/ — “Chief Justice John Roberts: Institutionalist or Hubris-in-Chief?” by Eric J. Segall, Georgia State University College of Law in 2021 -
"Across the vast landscape of constitutional law, Roberts has distorted precedent and ignored text and history to further his own policy preferences.
A master of the long game and the catchy sound bite, hubris, not institutionalism, most defines the Chief Justice of the United States."
#SCOTUS
3/n
In conversationabout 5 months ago from fosstodon.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Abstract and conclusion sections from the essay
  https://cdn.fosstodon.org/media_attachments/files/112/713/384/943/656/906/original/d514b1bd0830b83d.png
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu
  Chief Justice John Roberts: Institutionalist or Hubris-in-Chief?
  from Eric J. Segall
  The conventional wisdom among Supreme Court scholars and commentators is that Chief Justice John Roberts is an institutionalist who cares deeply about both his personal legacy and the Supreme Court’s prestige over time. This essay challenges that belief. While the Chief certainly cares about how the Court is perceived by the public, as do most of the justices, what most defines Roberts is his hubris—not a concern for the Court’s legitimacy or even his own place in history. Across the vast landscape of constitutional law, Roberts has distorted precedent and ignored text and history to further his own policy preferences. A master of the long game and the catchy sound bite, hubris, not institutionalism, most defines the Chief Justice of the United States.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice