a god's eye is impossible and thus irrelevant. an omniscient god that doesn't do anything is indistinguishable from nothing, and has nothing to offer us, who only learn though action.
and yet, "action without knowledge" isn't of much of an action to begin with. of the supposedly independent realms of "is" and "ought" the latter one happens the be meaningless without the former.
we ought to learn in order to pursue any "ought"s at all.
2/4