28/ “If exchange value weakens and ultimately disappears as the guiding means by which use values are both produced and distributed in society, so the need for money and all of the lustful pathologies associated with its use (as capital) and possession (as a consummate source of social power) will also disappear.”
I really don’t know where he’s going with this. He seems to say that money is needed as a practical medium for exchange in a society, but I think he’s also saying that if we can remove the “instrument” part of money then it cannot be abused. I don’t know what that means in practice.