Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://hachyderm.io/users/reillypascal/statuses/112634648183467390">Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them) (reillypascal@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jun-2024 10:06:03 JST</a><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@reillypascal" title="reillypascal@hachyderm.io"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/228560-48-20240117113310.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them)" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them)</a></section><article><p>"Every year, we encounter new, often ill-conceived, bills written by state, federal, and international regulators to tackle a broad set of digital topics ranging from child safety to artificial intelligence. These scattershot proposals to correct online harm are often based on censorship and news cycles...we propose another solution in a new report: Privacy First: A Better Way to Address Online Harms."</p><p><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/11/address-online-harms-we-must-first-do-privacy" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/11/address-online-harms-we-must-first-do-privacy</a></p><p><a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/EFF" rel="tag">#EFF</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Privacy" rel="tag">#Privacy</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Censorship" rel="tag">#Censorship</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Internet" rel="tag">#Internet</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/CivilRights" rel="tag">#CivilRights</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3257191#notice-6426109">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-06-18T10:06:03+09:00" title="Tuesday, 18-Jun-2024 10:06:03 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@reillypascal/112634648183467390" rel="external" title="Sent from hachyderm.io via ActivityPub">hachyderm.io</a></span></span><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@reillypascal/112634648183467390">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2798593">Infographic from the EFF"What would a comprehensive privacy law look like?
- No online behavioral ads.
- Data minimization.
- Opt-in consent.
- User rights to access, port, correct, and delete information.
- No preemption of state laws.
- Strong enforcement with a private right to action.
- No pay-for-privacy schemes.
- No deceptive design."</a></label><br><a href="https://media.hachyderm.io/media_attachments/files/112/634/626/381/848/383/original/35e146d5a0326d66.jpg" rel="external">https://media.hachyderm.io/media_attachments/files/112/634/626/381/848/383/original/35e146d5a0326d66.jpg</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.eff.org</div><h5><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/11/address-online-harms-we-must-first-do-privacy#EFF">To Address Online Harms, We Must Consider Privacy First</a></h5><div> from <span>Corynne McSherry, Cindy Cohn, Mario Trujillo, and Thorin Klosowski</span></div></header><div>In this report, we outline how many of the internet's ills have one thing in common: they're based on the business model of widespread corporate surveillance online. Dismantling this system would not only be a huge step forward to our digital privacy, it would raise the floor for serious discussions about the internet's future.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them) (reillypascal@hachyderm.io)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jun-2024 10:06:03 JST Reilly Spitzfaden (they/them)
"Every year, we encounter new, often ill-conceived, bills written by state, federal, and international regulators to tackle a broad set of digital topics ranging from child safety to artificial intelligence. These scattershot proposals to correct online harm are often based on censorship and news cycles...we propose another solution in a new report: Privacy First: A Better Way to Address Online Harms."
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/11/address-online-harms-we-must-first-do-privacy
#EFF #Privacy #Censorship #Internet #CivilRights
In conversationabout a year ago from hachyderm.iopermalink
Attachments
1. Infographic from the EFF "What would a comprehensive privacy law look like? - No online behavioral ads. - Data minimization. - Opt-in consent. - User rights to access, port, correct, and delete information. - No preemption of state laws. - Strong enforcement with a private right to action. - No pay-for-privacy schemes. - No deceptive design."
  https://media.hachyderm.io/media_attachments/files/112/634/626/381/848/383/original/35e146d5a0326d66.jpg
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.eff.org
  To Address Online Harms, We Must Consider Privacy First
  from Corynne McSherry, Cindy Cohn, Mario Trujillo, and Thorin Klosowski
  In this report, we outline how many of the internet's ills have one thing in common: they're based on the business model of widespread corporate surveillance online. Dismantling this system would not only be a huge step forward to our digital privacy, it would raise the floor for serious discussions about the internet's future.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice