Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/dahukanna/statuses/112627567518282743">Dawn Ahukanna (dahukanna@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jun-2024 02:53:59 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@dahukanna" title="dahukanna@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/101531-48-20230225005109.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Dawn Ahukanna" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Dawn Ahukanna</a><div><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p>Totally agree with <a href="https://mastodon.social/@PavelASamsonov">@PavelASamsonov</a> UX Design research isn’t about producing/writing output “persona” document. It’s about designing, setting up &amp; running your experiment to prove/disprove human behavior hypothesis.<br>This would be like a chemist not bothering with the laboratory experiment or Pharma not bothering with clinical trials &amp; letting LLM come up with words, cos cheaper &amp; unethical as hell!<br>&gt; "No, AI user research is not “better than nothing” — it’s much worse"<br>- <a href="https://uxdesign.cc/no-ai-user-research-is-not-better-than-nothing-its-much-worse-5add678ab9e7" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://uxdesign.cc/no-ai-user-research-is-not-better-than-nothing-its-much-worse-5add678ab9e7</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3255478#notice-6423026">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-06-18T02:53:59+09:00" title="Tuesday, 18-Jun-2024 02:53:59 JST">about 5 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@dahukanna/112627567518282743" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@dahukanna/112627567518282743">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: miro.medium.com</div><h5><a href="https://uxdesign.cc/no-ai-user-research-is-not-better-than-nothing-its-much-worse-5add678ab9e7">No, AI user research is not “better than nothing”—it’s much worse</a></h5><div> from <span>https://spavel.medium.com</span></div></header><div>Synthetic insights are not research. They are the fastest path to destroy the margins on your product.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Dawn Ahukanna (dahukanna@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 18-Jun-2024 02:53:59 JSTDawn Ahukanna
- Pavel A. Samsonov
Totally agree with @PavelASamsonov UX Design research isn’t about producing/writing output “persona” document. It’s about designing, setting up & running your experiment to prove/disprove human behavior hypothesis.
This would be like a chemist not bothering with the laboratory experiment or Pharma not bothering with clinical trials & letting LLM come up with words, cos cheaper & unethical as hell!
> "No, AI user research is not “better than nothing” — it’s much worse"
- https://uxdesign.cc/no-ai-user-research-is-not-better-than-nothing-its-much-worse-5add678ab9e7
In conversationabout 5 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: miro.medium.com
  No, AI user research is not “better than nothing”—it’s much worse
  from https://spavel.medium.com
  Synthetic insights are not research. They are the fastest path to destroy the margins on your product.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice