Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://journa.host/users/chrisgeidner/statuses/112572737646880600">Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Friday, 07-Jun-2024 11:18:14 JST</a><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner" title="chrisgeidner@journa.host"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/75697-48-20240516135537.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Chris Geidner" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Chris Geidner</a><div><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/112572704338265205" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>This was a three-judge panel of all Republican appointees. The decision smacking down Llano County, Jonathan Mitchell (defending Llano, of course), and Duncan comes from Judge Jacques Wiener, a GHWB appointee born during the Great Depression who opens by quoting Walt Whitman.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3204568#notice-6330336">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-06-07T11:18:14+09:00" title="Friday, 07-Jun-2024 11:18:14 JST">about 6 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/112572737646880600" rel="external" title="Sent from journa.host via ActivityPub">journa.host</a></span></span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/112572737646880600">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2747676">Jacques L. Wiener, Jr., Circuit Judge:
The dirtiest book in all the world is the expurgated book.1
Plaintiffs-Appellees, seven patrons of the Llano County library system
(“Plaintiffs”), brought this suit against Defendants-Appellants Llano
County, the members of the County’s Commissioners Court, the County’s
library system director, and the library board (collectively, “Defendants”).
Plaintiffs claim that Defendants violated their First Amendment right to
access information and ideas by removing seventeen books based on their
contents and messages. The district court granted Plaintiffs’ request for a
preliminary injunction, requiring Defendants to return “all print books that
were removed because of their viewpoint or content” and enjoining
Defendants from “removing any books . . . for any reason during the
pendency of this action.” Defendants appeal. For the reasons to follow, we
MODIFY the language of the injunction to ensure its proper scope, but
otherwise AFFIRM.</a></label><br><a href="https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/112/572/737/413/835/647/original/3306a573bbdeae87.png" rel="external">https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/112/572/737/413/835/647/original/3306a573bbdeae87.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Friday, 07-Jun-2024 11:18:14 JST Chris Geidner
in reply to
This was a three-judge panel of all Republican appointees. The decision smacking down Llano County, Jonathan Mitchell (defending Llano, of course), and Duncan comes from Judge Jacques Wiener, a GHWB appointee born during the Great Depression who opens by quoting Walt Whitman.
In conversationabout 6 months ago from journa.hostpermalink
Attachments
1. Jacques L. Wiener, Jr., Circuit Judge: The dirtiest book in all the world is the expurgated book.1 Plaintiffs-Appellees, seven patrons of the Llano County library system (“Plaintiffs”), brought this suit against Defendants-Appellants Llano County, the members of the County’s Commissioners Court, the County’s library system director, and the library board (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiffs claim that Defendants violated their First Amendment right to access information and ideas by removing seventeen books based on their contents and messages. The district court granted Plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction, requiring Defendants to return “all print books that were removed because of their viewpoint or content” and enjoining Defendants from “removing any books . . . for any reason during the pendency of this action.” Defendants appeal. For the reasons to follow, we MODIFY the language of the injunction to ensure its proper scope, but otherwise AFFIRM.
  https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/112/572/737/413/835/647/original/3306a573bbdeae87.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice