Embed Notice

@GottaLaff

Should the public NOT orchestrate a campaign when a judge REFUSES to hold a hearing on a person duly indicted?

Do we really have to resort to the days of threatening lynching, in order to force judges to fulfill their public responsibility of holding a trial, to avoid mob justice? That's why we as a society HAVE judges, and why trials have well established procedures, to avoid such mayhem.

Cannon has already failed at her job. In one of the most important cases this country has seen. She needs removal, to protect the public interest. And the public interest is in maintaining societal peace. If the court's administration cannot do that, then all bets are off.