Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/caseynewton/statuses/112561175600555255">Casey Newton (caseynewton@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Jun-2024 09:41:16 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@caseynewton" title="caseynewton@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/61006-48-20240126011805.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Casey Newton" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Casey Newton</a></section><article><p>There's yet another open letter from the AI safety crowd. If they want more people to take them seriously, they need to get more specific </p><p><a href="https://www.platformer.news/tuesday-newsletter/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.platformer.news/tuesday-newsletter/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3194314#notice-6311512">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-06-05T09:41:16+09:00" title="Wednesday, 05-Jun-2024 09:41:16 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@caseynewton/112561175600555255" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@caseynewton/112561175600555255">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2738065">At the same time, there’s no doubt that the AI safety argument has begun to feel a bit tedious over the past year, when the harms caused by large language models have been funnier than they have been terrifying. Last week, when OpenAI put out the first account of how its products are being used in covert influence operations, there simply wasn’t much there to report. We’ve seen plenty of problematic misuse of AI, particularly deepfakes in elections and in schools. (And of women in general.) And yet people who sign letters like the one released today fail to connect high-level hand-wringing about their companies to the products and policy decisions that their companies make. Instead, they speak through opaque open letters that have surprisingly little to say about what safe development might actually look like in practice.</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/561/175/352/843/994/original/3be006867caf5df5.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/561/175/352/843/994/original/3be006867caf5df5.png</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.platformer.news</div><h5><a href="https://www.platformer.news/tuesday-newsletter/">What aren’t the OpenAI whistleblowers saying?</a></h5><div> from <span>@CaseyNewton</span></div></header><div>A group of current and former employees say the company has been reckless — but aren’t offering many details</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Casey Newton (caseynewton@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Jun-2024 09:41:16 JST Casey Newton
There's yet another open letter from the AI safety crowd. If they want more people to take them seriously, they need to get more specific
https://www.platformer.news/tuesday-newsletter/
In conversation11 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. At the same time, there’s no doubt that the AI safety argument has begun to feel a bit tedious over the past year, when the harms caused by large language models have been funnier than they have been terrifying. Last week, when OpenAI put out the first account of how its products are being used in covert influence operations, there simply wasn’t much there to report. We’ve seen plenty of problematic misuse of AI, particularly deepfakes in elections and in schools. (And of women in general.) And yet people who sign letters like the one released today fail to connect high-level hand-wringing about their companies to the products and policy decisions that their companies make. Instead, they speak through opaque open letters that have surprisingly little to say about what safe development might actually look like in practice.
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/561/175/352/843/994/original/3be006867caf5df5.png
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.platformer.news
  What aren’t the OpenAI whistleblowers saying?
  from @CaseyNewton
  A group of current and former employees say the company has been reckless — but aren’t offering many details

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice