Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://fosstodon.org/users/kernellogger/statuses/112454796443487122">Thorsten Leemhuis (acct. 1/4) (kernellogger@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 17-May-2024 16:14:15 JST</a><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@kernellogger" title="kernellogger@fosstodon.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/109466-48-20230324184559.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Thorsten Leemhuis (acct. 1/4)" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Thorsten Leemhuis (acct. 1/4)</a></section><article><p>Jeremy Allison writes:</p><p>'"  The data shows that “frozen” vendor <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/Linux" rel="tag">#Linux</a> kernels, created by branching off a release point and then using a team of engineers to select specific patches to back-port to that branch, are buggier than the upstream “stable” Linux <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/kernel" rel="tag">#kernel</a> created by Greg Kroah-Hartman. '"</p><p><a href="https://ciq.com/blog/why-a-frozen-linux-kernel-isnt-the-safest-choice-for-security/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://ciq.com/blog/why-a-frozen-linux-kernel-isnt-the-safest-choice-for-security/</a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/LinuxKernel" rel="tag">#LinuxKernel</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3102442#notice-6147315">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-05-17T16:14:15+09:00" title="Friday, 17-May-2024 16:14:15 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@kernellogger/112454796443487122" rel="external" title="Sent from fosstodon.org via ActivityPub">fosstodon.org</a></span></span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@kernellogger/112454796443487122">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: ciq.com</div><h5><a href="https://ciq.com/blog/why-a-frozen-linux-kernel-isnt-the-safest-choice-for-security/">CIQ | Why a 'frozen' distribution Linux kernel isn't the safest choice for security</a></h5><div> from <span>@ctrliq</span></div></header><div>“Born of code and git commits and CVE's combining.
This frozen kernel has many bugs and a history worth data-mining." We all know the kind of advertisement: “These are the git mines. Working here we…</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Thorsten Leemhuis (acct. 1/4) (kernellogger@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 17-May-2024 16:14:15 JST Thorsten Leemhuis (acct. 1/4)
Jeremy Allison writes:
'" The data shows that “frozen” vendor #Linux kernels, created by branching off a release point and then using a team of engineers to select specific patches to back-port to that branch, are buggier than the upstream “stable” Linux #kernel created by Greg Kroah-Hartman. '"
https://ciq.com/blog/why-a-frozen-linux-kernel-isnt-the-safest-choice-for-security/ #LinuxKernel
In conversationabout a year ago from fosstodon.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: ciq.com
  CIQ | Why a 'frozen' distribution Linux kernel isn't the safest choice for security
  from @ctrliq
  “Born of code and git commits and CVE's combining. This frozen kernel has many bugs and a history worth data-mining." We all know the kind of advertisement: “These are the git mines. Working here we…

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice