The argument that "an American #president who attempted to overthrow our Constitution and to seize absolute power for himself by way of an armed #insurrection, a military #coup, or an #election fraud is absolutely #immune from all criminal prosecution under that very Constitution" suffers from the ignominy of being a self-sealing fallacious argument.
If this argument were to be deemed logically valid, then the sitting president could seize power, and declare the Constitution and our Democracy null and void. What would then be the point of having state and federal governments, laws, elections, or other indicia of democracy?
A 1L would not make such a silly mistake in first year con law class. Yet, the #SCotUS is seriously considering it.🤷♂️