Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mas.to/users/alexskunz/statuses/111660776724049498">Alexander S. Kunz (alexskunz@mas.to)'s status on Saturday, 27-Apr-2024 00:12:58 JST</a><a href="https://mas.to/@alexskunz" title="alexskunz@mas.to"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/27829-48-20240426151217.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Alexander S. Kunz" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Alexander S. Kunz</a></section><article><p>"Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant." (Karl Popper)</p><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2997275#notice-5953628">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-04-27T00:12:58+09:00" title="Saturday, 27-Apr-2024 00:12:58 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mas.to/@alexskunz/111660776724049498" rel="external" title="Sent from mas.to via ActivityPub">mas.to</a></span></span><a href="https://mas.to/@alexskunz/111660776724049498">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: upload.wikimedia.org</div><h5><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance">Paradox of tolerance</a></h5><div></div></header><div>The paradox of tolerance states that if a society's practice of tolerance is inclusive of the intolerant, intolerance will ultimately dominate, eliminating the tolerant and the practice of tolerance with them. Karl Popper describes the paradox as arising from the seemingly self-contradictory idea that, in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must retain the right to be intolerant of intolerance.Formulation
Preston King describes tolerance as occurring when one objects to but voluntarily endures certain acts, ideas, organisations and identities. This involves two components:An objection component, wherein an agent objects to an item. For instance, a follower of one faith may assert the beliefs of another faith are wrong. If this objection component is absent, the agent is not tolerant but simply indifferent.
An acceptance component, which does not resolve the objection but instead offers positive reasons for overlooking it, e.g. social harmony. This acceptance must be voluntary — enduring an oppressive government, for example, is not an instance of tolerance because it...</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Alexander S. Kunz (alexskunz@mas.to)'s status on Saturday, 27-Apr-2024 00:12:58 JST Alexander S. Kunz
"Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant." (Karl Popper)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
In conversationabout a year ago from mas.topermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: upload.wikimedia.org
  Paradox of tolerance
  The paradox of tolerance states that if a society's practice of tolerance is inclusive of the intolerant, intolerance will ultimately dominate, eliminating the tolerant and the practice of tolerance with them. Karl Popper describes the paradox as arising from the seemingly self-contradictory idea that, in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must retain the right to be intolerant of intolerance. Formulation Preston King describes tolerance as occurring when one objects to but voluntarily endures certain acts, ideas, organisations and identities. This involves two components: An objection component, wherein an agent objects to an item. For instance, a follower of one faith may assert the beliefs of another faith are wrong. If this objection component is absent, the agent is not tolerant but simply indifferent. An acceptance component, which does not resolve the objection but instead offers positive reasons for overlooking it, e.g. social harmony. This acceptance must be voluntary — enduring an oppressive government, for example, is not an instance of tolerance because it...

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice