Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://one.darnell.one/users/darnell/statuses/112214424747951087">Darnell Clayton :verified: (darnell@one.darnell.one)'s status on Friday, 05-Apr-2024 03:44:14 JST</a><a href="https://one.darnell.one/@darnell" title="darnell@one.darnell.one"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/903-48-20220924005929.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Darnell Clayton :verified:" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Darnell Clayton :verified:</a><div><a href="https://kafeneio.social/@heretical_i/112214371429326712" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://kafeneio.social/@heretical_i">@heretical_i</a> The same <a href="https://one.darnell.one/tags/Iran" rel="tag">#Iran</a> 🇮🇷 who backed away from a conflict they started with <a href="https://one.darnell.one/tags/Pakistan" rel="tag">#Pakistan</a> 🇵🇰‽ <a href="https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/iransource/pakistan-iran-miscalculation-vulnerabilities/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/iransource/pakistan-iran-miscalculation-vulnerabilities/</a></p><p>They would be devastated if they started a conflict with another nation as their military equipment is outdated.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2899386#notice-5764075">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-04-05T03:44:14+09:00" title="Friday, 05-Apr-2024 03:44:14 JST">about 8 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://one.darnell.one/@darnell/112214424747951087" rel="external" title="Sent from one.darnell.one via ActivityPub">one.darnell.one</a></span></span><a href="https://one.darnell.one/@darnell/112214424747951087">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.atlanticcouncil.org</div><h5><a href="https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/they-arent-listed-but-make-no-mistake-the-un-has-sanctions-on-the-taliban/">They aren't listed, but make no mistake: The UN has sanctions on the Taliban</a></h5><div> from <span>dmalloy</span></div></header><div>As the militant group settles in to rule Afghanistan again, sanctions remain one of the only viable points of leverage for the international community. Here's what the UN's own rules say.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Darnell Clayton :verified: (darnell@one.darnell.one)'s status on Friday, 05-Apr-2024 03:44:14 JSTDarnell Clayton :verified:
in reply to
- Heretical_i
@heretical_i The same #Iran 🇮🇷 who backed away from a conflict they started with #Pakistan 🇵🇰‽ https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/iransource/pakistan-iran-miscalculation-vulnerabilities/
They would be devastated if they started a conflict with another nation as their military equipment is outdated.
In conversationabout 8 months ago from one.darnell.onepermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.atlanticcouncil.org
  They aren't listed, but make no mistake: The UN has sanctions on the Taliban
  from dmalloy
  As the militant group settles in to rule Afghanistan again, sanctions remain one of the only viable points of leverage for the international community. Here's what the UN's own rules say.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice