Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://fosstodon.org/users/rauschma/statuses/112213130004550878">Axel Rauschmayer (rauschma@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 05-Apr-2024 01:33:00 JST</a><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@rauschma" title="rauschma@fosstodon.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/14578-48-20231122144129.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Axel Rauschmayer" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Axel Rauschmayer</a></section><article><p><a href="https://fosstodon.org/tags/TypeScript" rel="tag">#TypeScript</a>: Arrow functions help with partial evaluation [1] – e.g. a factory for functions for which there already is a type. Then they are more elegant than using .bind() [2]</p><p>const functionFactory = (factoryArg: string): FunctionType =&gt; (functionArg) =&gt; { … }</p><p>Note that the type of `functionArg` and the result type of the second arrow function are provided by `FunctionType`.</p><p>[1] <a href="https://2ality.com/2011/09/currying-vs-part-eval.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://2ality.com/2011/09/currying-vs-part-eval.html</a><br>[2] <a href="https://2ality.com/2016/02/arrow-functions-vs-bind.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://2ality.com/2016/02/arrow-functions-vs-bind.html</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2899105#notice-5763141">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-04-05T01:33:00+09:00" title="Friday, 05-Apr-2024 01:33:00 JST">about 8 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@rauschma/112213130004550878" rel="external" title="Sent from fosstodon.org via ActivityPub">fosstodon.org</a></span></span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@rauschma/112213130004550878">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://2ality.com/2011/09/currying-vs-part-eval.html">Currying versus partial application (with JavaScript code)</a></h5><div></div></header><div>Currying and partial application are two ways of transforming a function into another function with a generally smaller arity. While they are often confused with each other, they work differently. This post explains the details.</div><footer></footer></article></li><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://2ality.com/2016/02/arrow-functions-vs-bind.html">Arrow functions vs. `bind()`</a></h5><div></div></header><div>ES6 arrow functions are often a compelling alternative to Function.prototype.bind().</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Axel Rauschmayer (rauschma@fosstodon.org)'s status on Friday, 05-Apr-2024 01:33:00 JST Axel Rauschmayer
#TypeScript: Arrow functions help with partial evaluation [1] – e.g. a factory for functions for which there already is a type. Then they are more elegant than using .bind() [2]
const functionFactory = (factoryArg: string): FunctionType => (functionArg) => { … }
Note that the type of `functionArg` and the result type of the second arrow function are provided by `FunctionType`.
[1] https://2ality.com/2011/09/currying-vs-part-eval.html
[2] https://2ality.com/2016/02/arrow-functions-vs-bind.html
In conversationabout 8 months ago from fosstodon.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  Currying versus partial application (with JavaScript code)
  Currying and partial application are two ways of transforming a function into another function with a generally smaller arity. While they are often confused with each other, they work differently. This post explains the details.
2. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  Arrow functions vs. `bind()`
  ES6 arrow functions are often a compelling alternative to Function.prototype.bind().

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice