Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://fediscience.org/users/petersuber/statuses/111749254346439345">petersuber (petersuber@fediscience.org)'s status on Friday, 29-Mar-2024 00:20:36 JST</a><a href="https://fediscience.org/@petersuber" title="petersuber@fediscience.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/25101-48-20231017142148.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="petersuber" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">petersuber</a><div><a href="https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/111709731906931588" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>Update. <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Google" rel="tag">#Google</a> supports the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/RightToRepair" rel="tag">#RightToRepair</a> bill in <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Oregon" rel="tag">#Oregon</a>, even as applied to <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Pixel" rel="tag">#Pixel</a> phones. <br><a href="https://9to5google.com/2024/01/11/pixel-right-to-repair/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://9to5google.com/2024/01/11/pixel-right-to-repair/</a></p><p>But it adds this proviso: "Legislation should acknowledge the risks borne by unskilled repairers and allow original equipment manufacturers (OEM) to provide parts assemblies rather than individual components to reduce the risk of injury." </p><p>Primary source<br><a href="https://www.gstatic.com/gumdrop/sustainability/right-to-repair.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.gstatic.com/gumdrop/sustainability/right-to-repair.pdf</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/1337863#notice-5711147">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-03-29T00:20:36+09:00" title="Friday, 29-Mar-2024 00:20:36 JST">about 8 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/111749254346439345" rel="external" title="Sent from fediscience.org via ActivityPub">fediscience.org</a></span></span><a href="https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/111749254346439345">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2431623">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2431624">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
petersuber (petersuber@fediscience.org)'s status on Friday, 29-Mar-2024 00:20:36 JST petersuber
in reply to
Update. #Google supports the #RightToRepair bill in #Oregon, even as applied to #Pixel phones.
https://9to5google.com/2024/01/11/pixel-right-to-repair/
But it adds this proviso: "Legislation should acknowledge the risks borne by unskilled repairers and allow original equipment manufacturers (OEM) to provide parts assemblies rather than individual components to reduce the risk of injury."
Primary source
https://www.gstatic.com/gumdrop/sustainability/right-to-repair.pdf
In conversationabout 8 months ago from fediscience.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment
2. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice