Funny how people who work in universities come to this conclusion, bookchin says the same shit
Like okay maybe the narrow Marxian definition was always wrong - notice the reference to stagism in the above quote, so the Marxian categories were viable at an earlier stage but not now? Hmm? Where have I heard that?
But in any case seems like the wage labour is far more ubiquitous than it was 100 years ago -- back then we cpuld speak of other classes than just proles and capitalists -- and the basic relation of capitalist and worker is even more ossified than its ever been in history.