Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://toot.cafe/users/slightlyoff/statuses/112134855225973806">Alex Russell (slightlyoff@toot.cafe)'s status on Friday, 22-Mar-2024 05:15:51 JST</a><a href="https://toot.cafe/@slightlyoff" title="slightlyoff@toot.cafe"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/102598-48-20230410180654.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Alex Russell" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Alex Russell</a></section><article><p>Governments around the world have found exactly this every time they've looked hard at Apple keeping competing browsers at bay, but crikey. The DOJ is not playing around:</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2849719#notice-5659036">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-03-22T05:15:51+09:00" title="Friday, 22-Mar-2024 05:15:51 JST">about 8 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://toot.cafe/@slightlyoff/112134855225973806" rel="external" title="Sent from toot.cafe via ActivityPub">toot.cafe</a></span></span><a href="https://toot.cafe/@slightlyoff/112134855225973806">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2404927">"Apple wraps itself in a cloak of privacy, security, and consumer preferences to justify its anticompetitive conduct. Indeed, it spends billions on marketing and branding to promote the self-serving premise that only Apple can safeguard consumers’ privacy and security interests. Apple selectively compromises privacy and security interests when doing so is in Apple’s own financial interest—such as degrading the security of text messages, offering governments and certain companies the chance to access more private and secure versions of app stores, or accepting billions of dollars each year for choosing Google as its default search engine when more private options are available. In the end, Apple deploys privacy and security justifications as an elastic shield that can stretch or contract to serve Apple’s financial and business interests."</a></label><br><a href="https://assets.toot.cafe/media_attachments/files/112/134/849/931/499/301/original/430493a44971442c.png" rel="external">https://assets.toot.cafe/media_attachments/files/112/134/849/931/499/301/original/430493a44971442c.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Alex Russell (slightlyoff@toot.cafe)'s status on Friday, 22-Mar-2024 05:15:51 JST Alex Russell
Governments around the world have found exactly this every time they've looked hard at Apple keeping competing browsers at bay, but crikey. The DOJ is not playing around:
In conversationabout 8 months ago from toot.cafepermalink
Attachments
1. "Apple wraps itself in a cloak of privacy, security, and consumer preferences to justify its anticompetitive conduct. Indeed, it spends billions on marketing and branding to promote the self-serving premise that only Apple can safeguard consumers’ privacy and security interests. Apple selectively compromises privacy and security interests when doing so is in Apple’s own financial interest—such as degrading the security of text messages, offering governments and certain companies the chance to access more private and secure versions of app stores, or accepting billions of dollars each year for choosing Google as its default search engine when more private options are available. In the end, Apple deploys privacy and security justifications as an elastic shield that can stretch or contract to serve Apple’s financial and business interests."
  https://assets.toot.cafe/media_attachments/files/112/134/849/931/499/301/original/430493a44971442c.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice