Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://queer.hacktivis.me/objects/13bafae6-d9f9-4f45-ac47-4369c53cd64b">Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Friday, 22-Mar-2024 04:16:40 JST</a><a href="https://queer.hacktivis.me/users/lanodan" title="lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/792-48-20230912093141.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:</a><div><a href="https://moth.zone/objects/fdca9911-5778-4cbb-9a63-06d54f4059c1" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/116845" title="eri@moth.zone">eri :vlpn_smol::therian:</a></li></ul></div></section><article><a href="https://moth.zone/users/eri">@eri</a> <a href="https://fosstodon.org/@linux_mclinuxface">@linux_mclinuxface</a> <a href="https://seafoam.space/users/shroomie">@shroomie</a> There wasn't a CLA before the license change.<br>If a contributor didn't accept the license change (I doubt they asked anyone, we'd then have known for this happening well in advance), they're effectively violating the BSD license by not keeping copyright notices and clauses.<br>(Doesn't protects the source code though, because it's not copyleft)<br><br>See <a href="https://github.com/redis/redis/commit/0b34396924eca4edc524469886dc5be6c77ec4ed">https://github.com/redis/redis/commit/0b34396924eca4edc524469886dc5be6c77ec4ed</a></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2847638#notice-5658758">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-03-22T04:16:40+09:00" title="Friday, 22-Mar-2024 04:16:40 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/5658758" rel="external" title="Sent from gnusocial.jp via ActivityPub">gnusocial.jp</a></span></span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/5658758">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: opengraph.githubassets.com</div><h5><a href="https://github.com/redis/redis/commit/0b34396924eca4edc524469886dc5be6c77ec4ed">Change license from BSD-3 to dual RSALv2+SSPLv1 (#13157) · redis/redis@0b34396</a></h5><div></div></header><div>[Read more about the license change
here](https://redis.com/blog/redis-adopts-dual-source-available-licensing/)
Live long and prosper 🖖</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Friday, 22-Mar-2024 04:16:40 JSTHaelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
in reply to
- Kyle Davis
- eri :vlpn_smol::therian:
@eri @linux_mclinuxface @shroomie There wasn't a CLA before the license change.
If a contributor didn't accept the license change (I doubt they asked anyone, we'd then have known for this happening well in advance), they're effectively violating the BSD license by not keeping copyright notices and clauses.
(Doesn't protects the source code though, because it's not copyleft)

See https://github.com/redis/redis/commit/0b34396924eca4edc524469886dc5be6c77ec4ed
In conversationabout a year ago from gnusocial.jppermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: opengraph.githubassets.com
  Change license from BSD-3 to dual RSALv2+SSPLv1 (#13157) · redis/redis@0b34396
  [Read more about the license change here](https://redis.com/blog/redis-adopts-dual-source-available-licensing/) Live long and prosper 🖖

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice