Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mas.to/users/DanielMReck/statuses/112091396172057095">Daniel M. Reck (danielmreck@mas.to)'s status on Thursday, 14-Mar-2024 10:43:39 JST</a><a href="https://mas.to/@DanielMReck" title="danielmreck@mas.to"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/229550-48-20240916065715.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Daniel M. Reck" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Daniel M. Reck</a></section><article><p><a href="https://mas.to/tags/ScienceDirect" rel="tag">#ScienceDirect</a> and <a href="https://mas.to/tags/Elsevier" rel="tag">#Elsevier</a> clearly didn't review this <a href="https://mas.to/tags/chemistry" rel="tag">#chemistry</a> paper about <a href="https://mas.to/tags/batteries" rel="tag">#batteries</a>. The intro starts with "Certainly, here is a possible introduction for your topic:".</p><p>This lack of oversight erodes <a href="https://mas.to/tags/trust" rel="tag">#trust</a> in <a href="https://mas.to/tags/science" rel="tag">#science</a>. The paper needs to be retracted and the authors sanctioned immediately. </p><p><a href="https://mas.to/tags/GenerativeAI" rel="tag">#GenerativeAI</a> may have its uses in <a href="https://mas.to/tags/academic" rel="tag">#academic</a> <a href="https://mas.to/tags/writing" rel="tag">#writing</a>, but this is uncited <a href="https://mas.to/tags/plagiarism" rel="tag">#plagiarism</a> and <a href="https://mas.to/tags/dishonest" rel="tag">#dishonest</a> claim of original work. The <a href="https://mas.to/tags/AI" rel="tag">#AI</a> and <a href="https://mas.to/tags/LLM" rel="tag">#LLM</a> don't have an <a href="https://mas.to/tags/author" rel="tag">#author</a> credit.</p><p><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023024002402" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023024002402</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2822287#notice-5601527">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-03-14T10:43:39+09:00" title="Thursday, 14-Mar-2024 10:43:39 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mas.to/@DanielMReck/112091396172057095" rel="external" title="Sent from mas.to via ActivityPub">mas.to</a></span></span><a href="https://mas.to/@DanielMReck/112091396172057095">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Daniel M. Reck (danielmreck@mas.to)'s status on Thursday, 14-Mar-2024 10:43:39 JST Daniel M. Reck
#ScienceDirect and #Elsevier clearly didn't review this #chemistry paper about #batteries. The intro starts with "Certainly, here is a possible introduction for your topic:".
This lack of oversight erodes #trust in #science. The paper needs to be retracted and the authors sanctioned immediately.
#GenerativeAI may have its uses in #academic #writing, but this is uncited #plagiarism and #dishonest claim of original work. The #AI and #LLM don't have an #author credit.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468023024002402
In conversationabout a year ago from mas.topermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice