Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://were.social/objects/2c75a26b-1449-4e32-87b1-2c83d42cb7aa">arcanicanis (arcanicanis@were.social)'s status on Saturday, 09-Mar-2024 05:44:08 JST</a><a href="https://were.social/users/arcanicanis" title="arcanicanis@were.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/10459-48-20220918060352.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="arcanicanis" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">arcanicanis</a><div><a href="https://gleasonator.com/objects/99d87d93-f502-4e49-961a-fa3c8ecffaed" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p>It's all I routinely bitch about:</p><p><a href="https://were.social/notice/AfHlGgRYClScNnQFiy">https://were.social/notice/AfHlGgRYClScNnQFiy</a></p><p><a href="https://were.social/notice/AfYn3Wcauj4nkflBkO">https://were.social/notice/AfYn3Wcauj4nkflBkO</a></p><p>I assume it was originally under an ambitious idea to allow users to have control over their identity by cryptography, but implemented in such a half-baked way that was conceptually flawed, to the point where users cannot export their keys for risk of the entire server: <a href="https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/discussions/22315#discussioncomment-4423581">https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/discussions/22315#discussioncomment-4423581</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2803594#notice-5561829">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-03-09T05:44:08+09:00" title="Saturday, 09-Mar-2024 05:44:08 JST">about 9 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://were.social/objects/2c75a26b-1449-4e32-87b1-2c83d42cb7aa" rel="external" title="Sent from were.social via ActivityPub">were.social</a></span></span><a href="https://were.social/objects/2c75a26b-1449-4e32-87b1-2c83d42cb7aa">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: opengraph.githubassets.com</div><h5><a href="https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/discussions/22315#discussioncomment-4423581">Public Key without its Private Key ? · mastodon/mastodon · Discussion #22315</a></h5><div></div></header><div>In looking at the ActivityStream rendition of my profile page (i.e., "application/activity+json" content-type), I noticed a PEM representation of a Public Key. -----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY----- MIIBIjANBg...</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
arcanicanis (arcanicanis@were.social)'s status on Saturday, 09-Mar-2024 05:44:08 JSTarcanicanis
in reply to
- Alex Gleason
It's all I routinely bitch about:
https://were.social/notice/AfHlGgRYClScNnQFiy
https://were.social/notice/AfYn3Wcauj4nkflBkO
I assume it was originally under an ambitious idea to allow users to have control over their identity by cryptography, but implemented in such a half-baked way that was conceptually flawed, to the point where users cannot export their keys for risk of the entire server: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/discussions/22315#discussioncomment-4423581
In conversationabout 9 months ago from were.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: opengraph.githubassets.com
  Public Key without its Private Key ? · mastodon/mastodon · Discussion #22315
  In looking at the ActivityStream rendition of my profile page (i.e., "application/activity+json" content-type), I noticed a PEM representation of a Public Key. -----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY----- MIIBIjANBg...