Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://poa.st/objects/afdacc43-785d-4316-8ff8-698b86176343">Aether ??? (aether@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 07-Mar-2024 20:25:58 JST</a><a href="https://poa.st/users/Aether" title="aether@poa.st"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/3119-48-20220802142317.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Aether ???" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Aether ???</a><div><ul><li></ul></div></section><article>Apparently the "open" in "OpenAI" does not in fact mean open.<br><br>OpenAI has advised that the "open" in "OpenAI" means not actually open. At least as far as Elon Musk's lawsuit is concerned.<br><br><a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/03/openai-clarifies-the-meaning-of-open-in-its-name-responding-to-musk-lawsuit/">arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/03/openai-clarifies-the-meaning-of-open-in-its-name-responding-to-musk-lawsuit/</a><br><br>I'm not sure how they view this as a rebuttal, but that is the defense they are taking.<br><br><a href="https://eveningzoo.club/users/Humpleupagus">@Humpleupagus</a> Any legal opinion on this bold strategy?</article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2798948#notice-5550254">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-03-07T20:25:58+09:00" title="Thursday, 07-Mar-2024 20:25:58 JST">about 9 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://poa.st/objects/afdacc43-785d-4316-8ff8-698b86176343" rel="external" title="Sent from poa.st via ActivityPub">poa.st</a></span></span><a href="https://poa.st/objects/afdacc43-785d-4316-8ff8-698b86176343">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.arstechnica.net</div><h5><a href="https://arstechnica.com:443/information-technology/2024/03/openai-clarifies-the-meaning-of-open-in-its-name-responding-to-musk-lawsuit/">OpenAI responds to Elon Musk lawsuit by clarifying its “open“ nature</a></h5><div> from <span>@benjedwards</span></div></header><div>"The open in OpenAI means that everyone should benefit from the fruits of AI after it's built."</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Aether ??? (aether@poa.st)'s status on Thursday, 07-Mar-2024 20:25:58 JSTAether ???
- ?? Humpleupagus ??
Apparently the "open" in "OpenAI" does not in fact mean open.

OpenAI has advised that the "open" in "OpenAI" means not actually open. At least as far as Elon Musk's lawsuit is concerned.

arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/03/openai-clarifies-the-meaning-of-open-in-its-name-responding-to-musk-lawsuit/

I'm not sure how they view this as a rebuttal, but that is the defense they are taking.

@Humpleupagus Any legal opinion on this bold strategy?
In conversationabout 9 months ago from poa.stpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.arstechnica.net
  OpenAI responds to Elon Musk lawsuit by clarifying its “open“ nature
  from @benjedwards
  "The open in OpenAI means that everyone should benefit from the fruits of AI after it's built."

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice