Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.world/users/jeremyburge/statuses/112047247767726731">Jeremy Burge (jeremyburge@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 07-Mar-2024 00:17:32 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.world/@jeremyburge" title="jeremyburge@mastodon.world"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/84084-48-20240228023922.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Jeremy Burge" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Jeremy Burge</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.world/@jeremyburge/112044565246132773" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>Different approach between vendors on this: Apple is making all the older family emojis gender neutral, while Google has kept the gendered options showing different hairstyles for each person.</p><p>What is consistent is the commitment to replacing any and all family options with silhouettes <a href="https://blog.emojipedia.org/googles-emoji-15-1-support-in-noto-color-emoji/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://blog.emojipedia.org/googles-emoji-15-1-support-in-noto-color-emoji/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2794841#notice-5544056">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-03-07T00:17:32+09:00" title="Thursday, 07-Mar-2024 00:17:32 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.world/@jeremyburge/112047247767726731" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.world via ActivityPub">mastodon.world</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.world/@jeremyburge/112047247767726731">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2341587">Comparison of Google’s yellow somewhat realistic family emoji ‘before’ and an outlined silhouette family ‘after’.</a></label><br><a href="https://s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com/mastodonworld/media_attachments/files/112/047/247/236/745/536/original/bf6b3563388821a6.jpeg" rel="external">https://s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com/mastodonworld/media_attachments/files/112/047/247/236/745/536/original/bf6b3563388821a6.jpeg</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: blog.emojipedia.org</div><h5><a href="https://blog.emojipedia.org/googles-emoji-15-1-support-in-noto-color-emoji/">Google's Emoji 15.1 Support In Noto Color Emoji</a></h5><div> from <span>@KeithBroni</span></div></header><div>Today Google has officially unveiled its full-color designs for Unicode's latest approved emojis, which include a phoenix, a lime, smileys shaking their heads up and down, and a series of direction-specifying people emojis.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Jeremy Burge (jeremyburge@mastodon.world)'s status on Thursday, 07-Mar-2024 00:17:32 JST Jeremy Burge
in reply to
Different approach between vendors on this: Apple is making all the older family emojis gender neutral, while Google has kept the gendered options showing different hairstyles for each person.
What is consistent is the commitment to replacing any and all family options with silhouettes https://blog.emojipedia.org/googles-emoji-15-1-support-in-noto-color-emoji/
In conversationabout a year ago from mastodon.worldpermalink
Attachments
1. Comparison of Google’s yellow somewhat realistic family emoji ‘before’ and an outlined silhouette family ‘after’.
  https://s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com/mastodonworld/media_attachments/files/112/047/247/236/745/536/original/bf6b3563388821a6.jpeg
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: blog.emojipedia.org
  Google's Emoji 15.1 Support In Noto Color Emoji
  from @KeithBroni
  Today Google has officially unveiled its full-color designs for Unicode's latest approved emojis, which include a phoenix, a lime, smileys shaking their heads up and down, and a series of direction-specifying people emojis.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice