Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://dice.camp/users/miriamrobern/statuses/111998361138617549">Miriam Robern (miriamrobern@dice.camp)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 00:54:14 JST</a><a href="https://dice.camp/@miriamrobern" title="miriamrobern@dice.camp"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/108673-48-20250120121302.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Miriam Robern" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Miriam Robern</a></section><article><p>My friend found this and posted it elsesocial so I'm posting it here because it is glorious.</p><p><a href="https://dice.camp/tags/sewing" rel="tag">#sewing</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2764029#notice-5479906">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-02-27T00:54:14+09:00" title="Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 00:54:14 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://dice.camp/@miriamrobern/111998361138617549" rel="external" title="Sent from dice.camp via ActivityPub">dice.camp</a></span></span><a href="https://dice.camp/@miriamrobern/111998361138617549">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2308376">Text Description: a reproduction of a late 18th/early 20th century newspaper item, titled Why We Oppose Pockets For Women
1.-Because pockets are not a natural right. 
2.-Because the great majority of women do not want pockets. If they did, they would have them. 
3.-Because whenever women have had pockets they have not used them. 
4.-Because women are expected to carry enough things as it is without the additional burden of pockets. 
5.-Because it would make dissension between husband and wife as to whose pockets were to be filled. 
6.-Because it would destroy man’s chivalry toward woman if he did not have to carry all her things in his pockets. 
7.-Because men are men and women are women. We must not fly in the face of nature. 
8.-Because pockets have been used by men to carey tobacco, pipes, whiskey flasks, chewing gum and compromising letters. We see no reason to suppose that women would use them more wisely.</a></label><br><a href="https://cdn.masto.host/dicecamp/media_attachments/files/111/998/357/828/381/602/original/112a69b2d6eabe68.jpg" rel="external">https://cdn.masto.host/dicecamp/media_attachments/files/111/998/357/828/381/602/original/112a69b2d6eabe68.jpg</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Miriam Robern (miriamrobern@dice.camp)'s status on Tuesday, 27-Feb-2024 00:54:14 JST Miriam Robern
My friend found this and posted it elsesocial so I'm posting it here because it is glorious.
#sewing
In conversationabout a year ago from dice.camppermalink
Attachments
1. Text Description: a reproduction of a late 18th/early 20th century newspaper item, titled Why We Oppose Pockets For Women 1.-Because pockets are not a natural right. 2.-Because the great majority of women do not want pockets. If they did, they would have them. 3.-Because whenever women have had pockets they have not used them. 4.-Because women are expected to carry enough things as it is without the additional burden of pockets. 5.-Because it would make dissension between husband and wife as to whose pockets were to be filled. 6.-Because it would destroy man’s chivalry toward woman if he did not have to carry all her things in his pockets. 7.-Because men are men and women are women. We must not fly in the face of nature. 8.-Because pockets have been used by men to carey tobacco, pipes, whiskey flasks, chewing gum and compromising letters. We see no reason to suppose that women would use them more wisely.
  https://cdn.masto.host/dicecamp/media_attachments/files/111/998/357/828/381/602/original/112a69b2d6eabe68.jpg

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice