Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/users/strypey/statuses/111955110879123203">Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Feb-2024 04:35:58 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@strypey" title="strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/4086-48-20250114044441.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Strypey" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Strypey</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@VamptVo/111925795145846014" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/73817" title="stefan@stefanbohacek.online">Stefan Bohacek</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/@VamptVo">@VamptVo</a> <br>&gt; But Bluesky is not a fediverse server</p><p>... but since Ryan's bridge supports ActivityPub, it *is* a fediverse server. It effectively makes BlueSky part of the fediverse, in the same way Ryan's IndieWeb bridge makes IndieWeb sites part of the fediverse.</p><p>It allows people in the existing fediverse and BlueSky who want to interact to do that. Why is that such a bad thing?</p><p><a href="https://stefanbohacek.online/@stefan">@stefan</a> <br>&gt; I don't understand how this is functionally different from BlueSky supporting ActivityPub</p><p>This!</p><p>(1/2)</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2711686#notice-5428580">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-02-20T04:35:58+09:00" title="Tuesday, 20-Feb-2024 04:35:58 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@strypey/111955110879123203" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.nzoss.nz via ActivityPub">mastodon.nzoss.nz</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@strypey/111955110879123203">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.fediverse.it</div><h5><a href="http://www.fediverse.it/">Félicitations ! Votre domaine a bien été créé chez OVHcloud !</a></h5><div> from <span>OVHcloud</span></div></header><div>OVHcloud accompagne votre évolution grâce au meilleur des infrastructures web : hébergement, nom de domaine, serveur dédié, CDN, Cloud, Big Data, ...</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Feb-2024 04:35:58 JSTStrypey
in reply to
- Evan Minto
- Stefan Bohacek
@VamptVo
> But Bluesky is not a fediverse server
... but since Ryan's bridge supports ActivityPub, it *is* a fediverse server. It effectively makes BlueSky part of the fediverse, in the same way Ryan's IndieWeb bridge makes IndieWeb sites part of the fediverse.
It allows people in the existing fediverse and BlueSky who want to interact to do that. Why is that such a bad thing?
@stefan
> I don't understand how this is functionally different from BlueSky supporting ActivityPub
This!
(1/2)
In conversationabout a year ago from mastodon.nzoss.nzpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.fediverse.it
  Félicitations ! Votre domaine a bien été créé chez OVHcloud !
  from OVHcloud
  OVHcloud accompagne votre évolution grâce au meilleur des infrastructures web : hébergement, nom de domaine, serveur dédié, CDN, Cloud, Big Data, ...

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice