@tnuker @pernia @kirby

> I don't see either of anything can you send links

"No."

> I'm going to choose to not believe you for this one then

"...I am certainly not going to go comb a child's page to gather evidence that he's being sexual, I am uncomfortable with that idea."

> so you chose to blindly believe he was posting sexual interactions because he's 13?



I am going to point out, just once, that the explicit meaning of this interaction is a demand that I do something I think is wrong, or you choose to "not believe" me. I don't really care if you believe me, that's why I told you to go verify for yourself in the first place. You think 12 hours ago when he was re-sharing posts cw'd as "lewd posts" doesn't qualify, or are you just willfully ignorant? Either way, the phrasing here of our argument, was not misrepresented.