Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/HistoPol/statuses/111920827795012570">HistoPol (#HP) 🥥 🌴 (histopol@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Feb-2024 07:18:25 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@HistoPol" title="histopol@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/44595-48-20221221005726.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="HistoPol (#HP) 🥥 🌴" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">HistoPol (#HP) 🥥 🌴</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@HistoPol/111920803161022602" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/36733" title="gottalaff@mastodon.social">Laffy</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/63039" title="specked@social.right.wtf">specked :is: :uk: :usa: :pr:</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/75188" title="jonchevreau@mstdn.ca">JonChevreau</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://social.right.wtf/@specked">@specked</a> <a href="https://mstdn.ca/@JonChevreau">@JonChevreau</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@GottaLaff">@GottaLaff</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@emptywheel">@emptywheel</a> </p><p>(2/n)</p><p>...constitutional lawyer, but in my understanding, "the supreme law of the land" equates "levying War against" the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/UnitedStates" rel="tag">#UnitedStates</a> with doing likewise against any <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/NATO" rel="tag">#NATO</a> member state.</p><p>Thus, <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/TFG" rel="tag">#TFG</a> just invited the former arch-enemy of the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/ColdWar" rel="tag">#ColdWar</a>'s legal successor, the <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Russian" rel="tag">#Russian</a> Federation, to attack any member state, as <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Putler" rel="tag">#Putler</a> pleases. </p><p>In this logic, <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/TFG" rel="tag">#TFG</a> publicly committed treason.</p><p>Specific laws can hardly ever be interpreted in isolation.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2708283#notice-5372625">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-02-13T07:18:25+09:00" title="Tuesday, 13-Feb-2024 07:18:25 JST">about 9 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@HistoPol/111920827795012570" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@HistoPol/111920827795012570">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
HistoPol (#HP) 🥥 🌴 (histopol@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 13-Feb-2024 07:18:25 JSTHistoPol (#HP) 🥥 🌴
in reply to
@specked @JonChevreau @GottaLaff @emptywheel
(2/n)
...constitutional lawyer, but in my understanding, "the supreme law of the land" equates "levying War against" the #UnitedStates with doing likewise against any #NATO member state.
Thus, #TFG just invited the former arch-enemy of the #ColdWar's legal successor, the #Russian Federation, to attack any member state, as #Putler pleases.
In this logic, #TFG publicly committed treason.
Specific laws can hardly ever be interpreted in isolation.
In conversationabout 9 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice