Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/GottaLaff/statuses/111885154121254359">Laffy (gottalaff@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Feb-2024 00:06:50 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@GottaLaff" title="gottalaff@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/36733-48-20221130190414.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Laffy" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Laffy</a></section><article><p>‼️<a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/BREAKING" rel="tag">#BREAKING</a>!  🔥</p><p>Via Anna Bower:</p><p>BREAKING: DC Circuit Court of Appeals rules that Donald <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Trump" rel="tag">#Trump</a> is NOT IMMUNE from prosecution. <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/legal" rel="tag">#legal</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2684613#notice-5322101">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-02-07T00:06:50+09:00" title="Wednesday, 07-Feb-2024 00:06:50 JST">about 9 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@GottaLaff/111885154121254359" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@GottaLaff/111885154121254359">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2221949">10:02 w T E &lt; 8 W &amp; - Notice of Docket Activity The following transaction was entered on 02/06/2024 at 9:58:54 AM Eastern Standard Time and filed on 02/06/2024 Case Name: USA v. Donald Trump Case Number: 23-3228 Document(s): Document(s) Docket Text: PER CURIAM JUDGMENT [2038999] filed that the order of the District Court appealed from in this cause be affirmed, for the reasons in the accompanying opinion . The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate through February 12, 2024. If, within that period, Appellant notifies the Clerk in writing that he has filed an application with the Supreme Court for a stay of the mandate pending the filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari, the Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate pending the Supreme Court's final disposition of the application. The filing of a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc will not result in any withholding of the mandate, although the grant of rehearing or rehearing en banc would result in a recall of the mandate if the mandate has already issued. See D.C. Cir. R. 41(a)(4). Before Judges: Henderson, Childs and Pan. [23-3228] Notice will be electronically mailed to: Mr. Richard D. Bernstein: rbernsteinlaw@gmail.com Mr. Emil Bove: emil.bove@blanchelaw.com2 B CH</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/885/150/872/875/041/original/abfd5fc4ee3fc9a4.jpeg" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/885/150/872/875/041/original/abfd5fc4ee3fc9a4.jpeg</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Laffy (gottalaff@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 07-Feb-2024 00:06:50 JST Laffy
‼️#BREAKING! 🔥
Via Anna Bower:
BREAKING: DC Circuit Court of Appeals rules that Donald #Trump is NOT IMMUNE from prosecution. #legal
In conversationabout 9 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. 10:02 w T E < 8 W & - Notice of Docket Activity The following transaction was entered on 02/06/2024 at 9:58:54 AM Eastern Standard Time and filed on 02/06/2024 Case Name: USA v. Donald Trump Case Number: 23-3228 Document(s): Document(s) Docket Text: PER CURIAM JUDGMENT [2038999] filed that the order of the District Court appealed from in this cause be affirmed, for the reasons in the accompanying opinion . The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate through February 12, 2024. If, within that period, Appellant notifies the Clerk in writing that he has filed an application with the Supreme Court for a stay of the mandate pending the filing of a petition for a writ of certiorari, the Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate pending the Supreme Court's final disposition of the application. The filing of a petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc will not result in any withholding of the mandate, although the grant of rehearing or rehearing en banc would result in a recall of the mandate if the mandate has already issued. See D.C. Cir. R. 41(a)(4). Before Judges: Henderson, Childs and Pan. [23-3228] Notice will be electronically mailed to: Mr. Richard D. Bernstein: rbernsteinlaw@gmail.com Mr. Emil Bove: emil.bove@blanchelaw.com 2 B CH
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/885/150/872/875/041/original/abfd5fc4ee3fc9a4.jpeg

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice