Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://fediscience.org/users/petersuber/statuses/110859772042309388">petersuber (petersuber@fediscience.org)'s status on Tuesday, 30-Jan-2024 00:20:24 JST</a><a href="https://fediscience.org/@petersuber" title="petersuber@fediscience.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/25101-48-20231017142148.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="petersuber" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">petersuber</a><div><a href="https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/110854139952578053" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>Update. <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Republicans" rel="tag">#Republicans</a> failed yesterday in their attempt to jack up the difficulty of amending the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/Ohio" rel="tag">#Ohio</a> <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/constitution" rel="tag">#constitution</a>. <br><a href="https://www.npr.org/2023/08/08/1191679261/ohio-election-results-issue1-abortion-state-constitution-amendment-ballot-voters" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.npr.org/2023/08/08/1191679261/ohio-election-results-issue1-abortion-state-constitution-amendment-ballot-voters</a></p><p>As <a href="https://bird.makeup/users/ejdionne">@ejdionne</a> put it, "the majority backed majority rule." <br><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/08/08/ohio-referendum-abortion-republicans/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/08/08/ohio-referendum-abortion-republicans/</a></p><p>This bodes well for the <a href="https://fediscience.org/tags/ProChoice" rel="tag">#ProChoice</a> referendum scheduled for November.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2649879#notice-5251974">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-01-30T00:20:24+09:00" title="Tuesday, 30-Jan-2024 00:20:24 JST">about 10 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/110859772042309388" rel="external" title="Sent from fediscience.org via ActivityPub">fediscience.org</a></span></span><a href="https://fediscience.org/@petersuber/110859772042309388">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: media.npr.org</div><h5><a href="https://www.npr.org/2023/08/08/1191679261/ohio-election-results-issue1-abortion-state-constitution-amendment-ballot-votersAs">Ohio voters reject measure that would have made it harder to change constitution</a></h5><div></div></header><div>Ohio votes down Issue 1, rejecting conservative lawmakers' attempt to change the constitutional amendment process ahead of a vote on reproductive rights this November.</div><footer></footer></article></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2183113">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
petersuber (petersuber@fediscience.org)'s status on Tuesday, 30-Jan-2024 00:20:24 JST petersuber
in reply to
Update. #Republicans failed yesterday in their attempt to jack up the difficulty of amending the #Ohio #constitution.
https://www.npr.org/2023/08/08/1191679261/ohio-election-results-issue1-abortion-state-constitution-amendment-ballot-voters
As @ejdionne put it, "the majority backed majority rule."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/08/08/ohio-referendum-abortion-republicans/
This bodes well for the #ProChoice referendum scheduled for November.
In conversationabout 10 months ago from fediscience.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: media.npr.org
  Ohio voters reject measure that would have made it harder to change constitution
  Ohio votes down Issue 1, rejecting conservative lawmakers' attempt to change the constitutional amendment process ahead of a vote on reproductive rights this November.
2. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice