Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mas.to/users/Alexandrad1/statuses/111833985253271610">Alexandradal (alexandrad1@mas.to)'s status on Sunday, 28-Jan-2024 23:13:12 JST</a><a href="https://mas.to/@Alexandrad1" title="alexandrad1@mas.to"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/134585-48-20240414125741.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Alexandradal" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Alexandradal</a><div><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/89924" title="tokyo_0@mas.to">Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mas.to/@tokyo_0">@tokyo_0</a> <a href="https://mastodon.green/@pvonhellermannn">@pvonhellermannn</a> in article 78, the ICJ says that Israel must stop killing "members of the group'. It is even stronger than a ceasefire. The lack of this specific word is a PR spin in favor of Israel, imo.</p><p><a href="https://theintercept.com/2024/01/26/icj-ruling-gaza-genocide/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://theintercept.com/2024/01/26/icj-ruling-gaza-genocide/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2645090#notice-5243146">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-01-28T23:13:12+09:00" title="Sunday, 28-Jan-2024 23:13:12 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/5243146" rel="external" title="Sent from gnusocial.jp via ActivityPub">gnusocial.jp</a></span></span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/5243146">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2178122">In a 15-2 ruling, the ICJ judges ordered that Israel must prevent the following actions against the protected “group,” which the court defined as the Palestinians of Gaza: “(a) killing members of the group; ( b ) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; and ( d ) imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.” While the specific word “ceasefire” was not mentioned in the order, the ruling could not be clearer about the court’s intent.</a></label><br><a href="https://media.mas.to/masto-public/media_attachments/files/111/833/976/340/350/983/original/6667f0d68a82cf19.png" rel="external">https://media.mas.to/masto-public/media_attachments/files/111/833/976/340/350/983/original/6667f0d68a82cf19.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Alexandradal (alexandrad1@mas.to)'s status on Sunday, 28-Jan-2024 23:13:12 JSTAlexandradal
- Pauline von Hellermann
- Tokyo Outsider (337ppm)
@tokyo_0 @pvonhellermannn in article 78, the ICJ says that Israel must stop killing "members of the group'. It is even stronger than a ceasefire. The lack of this specific word is a PR spin in favor of Israel, imo.
https://theintercept.com/2024/01/26/icj-ruling-gaza-genocide/
In conversationabout a year ago from gnusocial.jppermalink
Attachments
1. In a 15-2 ruling, the ICJ judges ordered that Israel must prevent the following actions against the protected “group,” which the court defined as the Palestinians of Gaza: “(a) killing members of the group; ( b ) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; and ( d ) imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.” While the specific word “ceasefire” was not mentioned in the order, the ruling could not be clearer about the court’s intent.
  https://media.mas.to/masto-public/media_attachments/files/111/833/976/340/350/983/original/6667f0d68a82cf19.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice