Embed Notice

@admitsWrongIfProven

I am curious as to what you think those are. I don’t remember uttering any concrete steps of action in the near past.

I am not talking about any specific recent past suggestions. As you pointed out we often disagree, this is what we disagree on, not intent, but rather your interpritation of potential solutioins

To clarify: i am aware that randomness is a part of every success, by the very nature of our reality. I merely wish that returns would not snowball limitlessly, as humans are not good at determining a reasonable “enough”.

If that is the case your argument was poorly framed, since you were arguing about why should someone have success by luck of birth. In reality luck of birth then isnt the issue at all, your issue is that having money makes it easier to make money than not having money (in terms of percentage not absolute return)… thats the snowball effect.. and THAT actually would have been a valid argument in my eyes.

I agree, though still bounded.

I see no need for bounds. There is nothing that needs correcting just because a persons skills are extraordinarily valuable.