Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://newsie.social/users/freedomofpress/statuses/111767253042590138">Freedom of the Press (freedomofpress@newsie.social)'s status on Wednesday, 17-Jan-2024 12:23:19 JST</a><a href="https://newsie.social/@freedomofpress" title="freedomofpress@newsie.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/87454-48-20230222190111.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Freedom of the Press" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Freedom of the Press</a></section><article><p>Awful ruling upholding Indiana’s law against recording police within 25 feet. Similar laws have been ruled unconstitutional elsewhere because recording cops is an established First Amendment right. </p><p>The IN lawmaker behind the law reportedly said citizens like those who recorded George Floyd’s murder were “involved in a situation that’s none of their business.” That tells you all you need to know. <a href="https://thedissenter.org/us-judge-rules-in-favor-of-police-buffer-law-viewed-as-threat-to-rights-of-journalists/?ref=the-dissenter-newsletter" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://thedissenter.org/us-judge-rules-in-favor-of-police-buffer-law-viewed-as-threat-to-rights-of-journalists/?ref=the-dissenter-newsletter</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2598191#notice-5146270">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-01-17T12:23:19+09:00" title="Wednesday, 17-Jan-2024 12:23:19 JST">about 10 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://newsie.social/@freedomofpress/111767253042590138" rel="external" title="Sent from newsie.social via ActivityPub">newsie.social</a></span></span><a href="https://newsie.social/@freedomofpress/111767253042590138">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: thedissenter.org</div><h5><a href="https://thedissenter.org/us-judge-rules-in-favor-of-police-buffer-law-viewed-as-threat-to-rights-of-journalists/?ref=the-dissenter-newsletter">US Court Decision Defends 25-Foot Police 'Buffer Law'</a></h5><div> from <span>@kgosztola</span></div></header><div>"The law has many legitimate applications,” Judge Damon R. Leichty stated. "Any effect on speech is minimal and incidental only."</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Freedom of the Press (freedomofpress@newsie.social)'s status on Wednesday, 17-Jan-2024 12:23:19 JST Freedom of the Press
Awful ruling upholding Indiana’s law against recording police within 25 feet. Similar laws have been ruled unconstitutional elsewhere because recording cops is an established First Amendment right.
The IN lawmaker behind the law reportedly said citizens like those who recorded George Floyd’s murder were “involved in a situation that’s none of their business.” That tells you all you need to know. https://thedissenter.org/us-judge-rules-in-favor-of-police-buffer-law-viewed-as-threat-to-rights-of-journalists/?ref=the-dissenter-newsletter
In conversationabout 10 months ago from newsie.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: thedissenter.org
  US Court Decision Defends 25-Foot Police 'Buffer Law'
  from @kgosztola
  "The law has many legitimate applications,” Judge Damon R. Leichty stated. "Any effect on speech is minimal and incidental only."

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice