@mk @p @p @jeffcliff @p

> zfs is are filesystem, volume-manager and raid-controller.

Yes. The RAID is something the OS or the hardware does and volume management is something the OS does. It requires an extensive userspace to handle those things. This design strikes me as bloated and fragile. I am not convinced it fits any use-cases I have better than the other things I use. I've read a lot of thatcks's commentary on it, and he's bullish on it but is honest about drawbacks.

> you're a retarded npc that copies bullshit from other people without your own opinion.

I said "Maybe the way it works on Linux is worse than elsewhere; I hear that's the case." I do not like ZFS, but that may be colored by the fact that I have not used it on Solaris, where it is allegedly very nice. Getting defensive over someone not liking your pet technology strikes me as closer to "retarded NPC copying opinions", and selling it as a silver bullet means you are 20. I mean, you literally said "Do these steps, starting with Hetzner (for some reason)" and insulted me when I said "zfs is not my favorite filesystem and I'm not using Hetzner": taking you at face value *would* be copying bullshit, you got angry that I declined to copy your bullshit.