Narrator of this book is asked if a deed can be good if it also benefits the do-er. Pretty weak sauce as questions go, but his answer is the worst. First he calls it a "Kobiyashi Maru question" (an unwinnable scenario in Star Trek; at best it's like...a question about which one could have an opinion), and then goes on to use the phrase "one- sided quid pro quo," which is nonsense. I just...do you even philosophy, bruh?