@p @Grandtheftautism @MisterRogersSnapped @fba @sysrq

>NazBol
This categorization can vary from "Nationalists taking tankies into account" to "edgy populism" to "commies appropriating Nazis".
Any form of Russian nationalism should accept the positives of the Communist past. This is evident if you notice how certain communist aspects, such as the public works and the Red army, are perceived.

>Dugin on Stalin
I don't know where you are getting this from. I have been on and off reading his posts for some years now and never came across something like this.
I took a look at wikipedia's source from 2012 about Dugin saying "we are for Stalin and for the Soviet Union" and came up with this:
>Question : The patriotic press is read by Soviet patriots and religious patriots, Orthodox Christians, Muslims and others. The introduction of religious lessons drives a wedge into the patriotic camp, and this split becomes very significant, don’t you think?
>Alexander Dugin : [...] wanting to unite Soviet and Russian patriots, and every time, at every stage, during one campaign or another, hostile forces manage to separate us on different sides in order to assert their disgusting Russophobic models. This must be stopped, we are for Stalin and for the Soviet Union, but the fact that Orthodoxy is the stronghold of our spiritual identity is clear to any bearer of Soviet or Orthodox identity.
And it does makes sense in this context because that's his main position, to construct a Russian national identity, and in order to do so you must take into account the Communist in order to be able to include the part of the population that is still pro-Soviet.

>She seemed like her main idea was "That was terrible...I want exactly the opposite of it."
This is a very bad way to think and always leads to failure no matter what your original intentions were.