Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://zirk.us/users/JamesGleick/statuses/111670953256218209">James Gleick (jamesgleick@zirk.us)'s status on Monday, 01-Jan-2024 02:30:18 JST</a><a href="https://zirk.us/@JamesGleick" title="jamesgleick@zirk.us"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/82007-48-20240515193754.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="James Gleick" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">James Gleick</a></section><article><p>Using <a href="https://zirk.us/tags/ChapGPT" rel="tag">#ChapGPT</a> to generate text for fun is one thing. Using ChatGPT to generate text that matters is a very bad idea. Using ChapGPT to generate text with legal force might be worst of all.</p><p>What these judges apparently don’t realize is that ChatGPT’s superpower is plausibility. Its errors are that much more difficult to catch. Its output often looks right even when it’s utterly wrong.</p><p><a href="https://gizmodo.com/uk-judges-now-permitted-use-chatgpt-in-legal-rulings-1851093046" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://gizmodo.com/uk-judges-now-permitted-use-chatgpt-in-legal-rulings-1851093046</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2523319#notice-4995030">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-01-01T02:30:18+09:00" title="Monday, 01-Jan-2024 02:30:18 JST">about 11 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://zirk.us/@JamesGleick/111670953256218209" rel="external" title="Sent from zirk.us via ActivityPub">zirk.us</a></span></span><a href="https://zirk.us/@JamesGleick/111670953256218209">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
James Gleick (jamesgleick@zirk.us)'s status on Monday, 01-Jan-2024 02:30:18 JST James Gleick
Using #ChapGPT to generate text for fun is one thing. Using ChatGPT to generate text that matters is a very bad idea. Using ChapGPT to generate text with legal force might be worst of all.
What these judges apparently don’t realize is that ChatGPT’s superpower is plausibility. Its errors are that much more difficult to catch. Its output often looks right even when it’s utterly wrong.
https://gizmodo.com/uk-judges-now-permitted-use-chatgpt-in-legal-rulings-1851093046
In conversationabout 11 months ago from zirk.uspermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice